More Insanity!!!

County Sues Farmer, Cites Too Many Crops
WSB-TV

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/24979774/detail.html

Posted: 5:20 pm EDT September 12, 2010Updated: 10:00 am EDT September 13, 2010
DEKALB COUNTY, Ga. — DeKalb County is suing a local farmer for growing too many vegetables, but he said he will fight the charges in the ongoing battle neighbors call “Cabbagegate.”

Fig trees, broccoli and cabbages are among the many greens that line the soil on Steve Miller’s more than two acres in Clarkston, who said he has spent fifteen years growing crops to give away and sell at local farmers markets.

“It’s a way of life, like it’s something in my blood,” said Miller.

In January, Dekalb County code enforcement officers began ticketing him for growing too many crops for the zoning and having unpermitted employees on site.

Miller stopped growing vegetables this summer and the charges were put on hold as he got the property rezoned.

WATCH: Farmer Sued For Excessive Veggies

Two weeks after approval, however, his attorney said the county began prosecuting the old charges, saying he was technically in violation before the rezoning.

“It should go away. I think it borders on harassment,” said Miller’s attorney Doug Dillard.

Miller faces nearly $5,000 in fines, but he said he plans to fight those citations in recorders court later this month.

A county spokesperson said officials can’t discuss the matter while it is in court, but neighbors were quick to come to his defense.

“When he moved here and I found out what he was doing I said, ‘Steve, you’re the best thing that ever happened to Cimarron Drive. And I still say that,” said neighbor Britt Fayssoux.

An Obvious Criminal Enterprise

Oregon Health Department Food Nazis Assail Lemonade Stand!

Seven-year-old Julie Murphy of Oregon City still smiles about her enterprise despite running afoul of county inspectors for an unlicensed lemonade stand at Last Thursday.

UPDATE: Multnomah County chairman tells inspectors to stand down and apologizes to Julie and her family.

It’s hardly unusual to hear small-business owners gripe about licensing requirements or complain that heavy-handed regulations are driving them into the red.

So when Multnomah County shut down an enterprise last week for operating without a license, you might just sigh and say, there they go again.

Except this entrepreneur was a 7-year-old named Julie Murphy. Her business was a lemonade stand at the Last Thursday monthly art fair in Northeast Portland. The government regulation she violated? Failing to get a $120 temporary restaurant license.

Turns out that kids’ lemonade stands — those constants of summertime — are supposed to get a permit in Oregon, particularly at big events that happen to be patrolled regularly by county health inspectors.

“I understand the reason behind what they’re doing and it’s a neighborhood event, and they’re trying to generate revenue,” said Jon Kawaguchi, environmental health supervisor for the Multnomah County Health Department. “But we still need to put the public’s health first.”

Julie had become enamored of the idea of having a stand after watching an episode of cartoon pig Olivia running one, said her mother, Maria Fife. The two live in Oregon City, but Fife knew her daughter would get few customers if she set up her stand at home.

Plus, Fife had just attended Last Thursday along Portland’s Northeast Alberta Street for the first time and loved the friendly feel and the diversity of the grass-roots event. She put the two things together and promised to take her daughter in July.

The girl worked on a sign, coloring in the letters and decorating it with a drawing of a person saying “Yummy.” She made a list of supplies.

Then, with gallons of bottled water and packets of Kool-Aid, they drove up last Thursday with a friend and her daughter. They loaded a wheelbarrow that Julie steered to the corner of Northeast 26th and Alberta and settled into a space between a painter and a couple who sold handmade bags and kids’ clothing.

Even before her daughter had finished making the first batch of lemonade, a man walked up to buy a 50-cent cup.

“They wanted to support a little 7-year-old to earn a little extra summer loot,” she said. “People know what’s going on.”

Even so, Julie was careful about making the lemonade, cleaning her hands with hand sanitizer, using a scoop for the bagged ice and keeping everything covered when it wasn’t in use, Fife said.

After 20 minutes, a “lady with a clipboard” came over and asked for their license. When Fife explained they didn’t have one, the woman told them they would need to leave or possibly face a $500 fine.

Surprised, Fife started to pack up. The people staffing the booths next to them encouraged the two to stay, telling them the inspectors had no right to kick them out of the neighborhood gathering. They also suggested that they give away the lemonade and accept donations instead and one of them made an announcement to the crowd to support the lemonade stand.

That’s when business really picked up — and two inspectors came back, Fife said. Julie started crying, while her mother packed up and others confronted the inspectors. “It was a very big scene,” Fife said.

Technically, any lemonade stand — even one on your front lawn — must be licensed under state law, said Eric Pippert, the food-borne illness prevention program manager for the state’s public health division. But county inspectors are unlikely to go after kids selling lemonade on their front lawn unless, he conceded, their front lawn happens to be on Alberta Street during Last Thursday.

“When you go to a public event and set up shop, you’re suddenly engaging in commerce,” he said. “The fact that you’re small-scale I don’t think is relevant.”

Kawaguchi, who oversees the two county inspectors involved, said they must be fair and consistent in their monitoring, no matter the age of the person. “Our role is to protect the public,” he said.

The county’s shutdown of the lemonade stand was publicized by Michael Franklin, the man at the booth next to Fife and her daughter. Franklin contributes to the Bottom Up Radio Network, an online anarchist site, and interviewed Fife for his show.

Franklin is also organizing a “Lemonade Revolt” for Last Thursday in August. He’s calling on anarchists, neighbors and others to come early for the event and grab space for lemonade stands on Alberta between Northeast 25th and Northeast 26th.

As for Julie, the 7-year-old still tells her mother “it was a bad day.” When she complains about the health inspector, Fife reminds her that the woman was just doing her job. She also promised to help her try again — at an upcoming neighborhood garage sale.

While Fife said she does see the need for some food safety regulation, she thinks the county went too far in trying to control events as unstructured as Last Thursday.

“As far as Last Thursday is concerned, people know when they are coming there that it’s more or less a free-for-all,” she said. “It’s gotten to the point where they need to be in all of our decisions. They don’t trust us to make good choices on our own.”

— Helen Jung

US Senate Candidate Chuck Purgason… the Longest Missouri Filibuster!

The State Senator who has already proven that he will stand against immense political pressure to compromise freedom principles, is taking a tremendous stand right now. He ran the NAIS constraining legislation in Missouri and took unbelievable flack from proponents of NAIS and would not back down. Now he won’t back down on a deceptively named bill that has had a lot of political intrigue behind it.

The “Manufacturing Jobs Act” is a bill that tries to bribe Ford Motor Company to stay here, even though Ford hasn’t asked for a bribe, nor have they testified for the bribe. This is a Missouri attempt at following Federal economic policy, and Purgason is filibustering in this special session “till he drops” to stop this bill. What that means, is he went for more than 20 hours.

A little history on this bill indicates that there must be some push from on high in the Republican leadership in Missouri. In regular session, this bill was filibustered and dropped. At nearly the end of session, Missouri’s Democratic Governor, Jay Nixon visited the President Pro Tem of the Senate at his office for a 45 minute closed door meeting with armed guards stationed outside. After that meeting, there was a Special Session called by the Governor.

Now,I am not clear on all the rules regarding irregular legislative processes, but I know enough to recognize untoward party and leadership pressure. Purgason was removed from his Chairmanship of the Government Accountability and Fiscal Oversight Committee by the President Pro Tem of the Senate because Purgason wouldn’t bring the bill to a vote…..Remember this bill died in regular session.

Prior to removing Purgason as Chair and installing himself as Chair, the President of the Senate, Charlie Shields had a 45 minute meeting at the end of regular session with Democratic Governor Jay Nixon, who really wants this bill….Neither one of them, nor the armed guards outside of Shields’ office, said what transpired in the meeting. But a Special Session was agreed upon.

During the Special Session, on the House side of things, House President Pro Tem, Bryan Pratt (who referred to the bill as a bail out bill) and Representative Kraus were removed and replaced from the Committee the bill had to go through to make it to House floor.

So, strong arm tactics with leadership in both parties pushing hard for the same legislation that is highly questionable, seems indicative of something seriously wrong in the General Assembly at least…..It would be my guess that if one were able to follow the money, it would go back to the powers behind the parties. It would take a good long while to chase that bunny down the trail, but the behaviour of the leadership strongly suggests that there is a bunny to run down.

Farmer’s Killing Themselves —

The article below brushes the surface of the problems faced on the farm. Farmers are the most pro-life bunch of people you will encounter. The hopelessness resulting from market control and lack of access to viable markets is multiplying….Be a revolutionary and buy direct from a farmer. ….


Need a Real Sponsor here

July 26, 2009, 8:17 AM ET
The Human Toll: Farmer Suicides on the Rise

Fluctuations in oil prices over the last couple years have received no shortage of headlines, but they’re not the only commodity that has seen an increase – followed by a collapse – in prices. The same has happened in agriculture, and the impact of sharply lower prices combined with weak demand and tight credit is taking a devastating toll on farmers.

http://online.wsj.com/media/dairy_D_20090726081231.jpg

In Colorado, for example, 14 farmers and ranchers took their lives last year, double the rate five years ago, according to the Denver Post. In Maine, the Bangor Daily News has reported of at least three known farmer suicides so far this year. Two dairy famers in California have taken their lives in the last six months. The Iowa-based “Sowing the Seeds of Hope” hotline, which serves farmers in seven Midwest states, has fielded about 11,000 calls through April, a 20% increase from the same period a year ago, according to the Post and the Iowa Independent.

“The increase in calls really started with the change in dairy prices, as they fell last fall,” Mike Rosmann, a clinical psychologist and farmer who heads the hotline jointly sponsored by AgriWellness and Iowa State University Extension, told the Post.

Scott Hoese, a Minnesota dairy farmer, described the industry’s struggles in testimony before the House Agriculture Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy & Poultry on Tuesday.

“Dairy farmers of all sizes and across all regions of the country are enduring an unprecedented disaster,” he said. “Equity is rapidly disappearing, market prices remain at 1970 levels, creditors are cutting off producers – yet there is no relief in sight.”

“As quickly as dairy prices peaked last year, they have just as quickly collapsed and have been well below the cost of production,” he said. “Our latest data shows consumers paying $4.99 for a pound of cheddar cheese while the farmer receives less than $1.00; farmers receive $0.97 out of the $2.99 consumers pay for a gallon of fat free milk. At a time when more consumers are eating at home, thereby increasing retail dairy product sales, producers are losing money on every gallon of milk sold.”

The global nature of the current downturn has also taken a toll, he said, wiping out other nations’ demand for U.S. agricultural exports. “Time is of the essence for dairy producers. Many continue to lose $100-$200 per dairy cow per month with no immediate increase in the market on the horizon,” he said. “As a producer, it has been frustrating, to say the least, to weather one of the worst economic periods in 30 years yet it seems as though our society as a whole has not grasped how desperate our situation is.”

Copyright 2008 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Agreeing to be Run by Trade-Not logic

Below you will find another case of an organization, possibly in ignorance, agreeing to give up the thing it is supposed to be protecting for it’s membership. We have Congress giving away our freedom daily and organizations continually compromising away our rights along with them. The key here is Codex and the OIE. This statement doesn’t say so outright, but agrees to GAP, which are “good agricultural practices”-they aren’t good, they are control mechanisms to engage in business- full traceability, auditing, certifying, verifying, licensing and inspecting every single thing done in the production of food. It’s a recipe for world-wide famine.

========
Fort Worth, Texas – The Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association (TSCRA), the state’s largest and oldest livestock association, passed policy regarding the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) new animal disease traceability plan. The policy was passed Friday at the association’s summer meeting.

On Feb. 5, USDA announced a new framework for animal disease traceability in the U.S. USDA will publish the rule which will open it for comment in December. The new framework replaces the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) that was strongly opposed by numerous livestock industries and associations, including TSCRA.

TSCRA supports an animal disease traceability program that adheres to the following criteria:

1. Additional costs to the beef and dairy industries must be minimized.

2. Any information relative to cattle identification information should be under the control of state animal health officials and kept confidential.

3. The system must operate at the speed of commerce.

4. The priority livestock for participation in the framework is the individual identification of adult cattle.

5. Producers must be protected from liability for acts of others after cattle have left their control.

6. The purpose of the animal disease traceability system should be solely animal disease surveillance, control and eradication. The only data required to be collected should be that necessary to accomplish this goal.

7. Support the flexibility of using currently established and evolving official identification methods.

8. Full compliance with the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) and Codex Alimentarius Commission international standards for animal identification and traceability.

9. The animal data management system does not replace or impede existing TSCRA brand inspection activities.

TSCRA passed additional policy supporting good surface water quality standards based on sound science, landowner input, an emphasis on voluntary management practices, water quality protection and sustainable economic development.

Policy was also passed that supports removing the 150 mile restriction on livestock and farm operators from federal and state motor vehicle laws. Under current law, livestock or farm operators who operate equipment not for hire and without a commercial driver’s license, for the transport of livestock or farm products, cannot exceed 150 miles.

The Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association is a 133-year-old trade organization. As the largest and oldest livestock association in Texas, TSCRA represents more than 15,000 beef cattle producers, ranching families and businesses who manage approximately 4 million head of cattle on 51.5 million acres of range and pasture land, primarily in Texas and Oklahoma.

TSCRA provides law enforcement and livestock inspection services, legislative and regulatory advocacy, industry news and information, insurance services and educational opportunities for its members and the industry.

Source: Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association

And by the way…..

Just in case anyone was curious, I write from time to time for News with Views and have a weekly radio show on Liberty News Radio every Saturday from 10 to 11am….In between, I do laundry, garden,dishes, cooking (although I would rather raise the food than cook it!) manage a farm, home school, bake bread, make cheese and fight for truth, freedom and fluffy pancakes.

And in my spare time, I try to figure out how technology can be used for good and not evil!

Missouri Set to Get Ohio’s Issue 2—Act now!

For those in Missouri, we need to get on this!

We have only a few days left in session at Jefferson City. We have a very, very negative bill looking to go through the Senate and we have got to get active against it or be faced with a myriad of committees acting like the “Milk Board” and telling us all what we have to do, how we must do it, and when in order to remain engaged in agriculture.

SB 795 is the Omnibus Ag Act, and it is compilation of a lot of good intentions gone awry. The good bits cannot be separated from the bad bits at this point.

This bill is a serious affront to anyone who loves freedom…To be ruled by non-elected unaccountable committees is actually a Soviet system of governance, and SB 795 sets that up in agriculture quite succinctly. While there are tremendous concerns with the food supply and it’s safety for consumption, as well as the attempts by the HSUS to control how animals are raised (with their real intent to STOP all animal ownership as the final goal), the oversight to be established by LAW in Missouri via SB 795 is completely unacceptable. Warm fuzzy language aside, the establishment of committees dominated by corporate ag will hasten the destruction to independent agriculture that the policies employed by the USDA for decades have caused.

The bill does the following, with all of the agency authority to promulgate rules and regulations behind it:

Sets up a committee of major agribusiness proponents to establish ‘acceptable’ animal care standards. This is Ohio’s Issue 2, just in Missouri instead.

Sets up a committee to oversee “Urban Agriculture”.

Sets up a misdirected attempt to further local food producers access to market by establishing a “sustainable” “farm to institution” initiative —WITH the authority to promulgate rules and regulations regarding the initiative. There is concern that the committee establishing the guidelines for ‘animal care’ will have oversight of this program as well and the group pushing for this initiative would like the bill killed as it has been ‘adulterated’.

Establishes in law the ‘right to own animals’ so long as they are raised in accordance with ‘standards’ set by the University of Missouri. This section also seriously threatens local control and private property rights.

Establishes licensing requirements for egg selling.

Establishes very complex licensing requirements for ‘blasters’ with a highly specific exemption list that does -NOT- clearly preclude reloaders as exempt from licensing requirements.

It also establishes horse slaughter and provides highly specific requirements for engagement in that activity. One of the requirements is that should someone purchase more than 5 pounds of horse meat, the seller must take their name address and contact information and hold that for disclosure to an interested authority.

It also does a few other things, but overall, this bill is very unfriendly to freedom and it fails to meaningfully address the real issues that cause agriculture to be a difficult field to negotiate a viable living through.

If you love freedom or good food, or farming, you need to oppose this bill and oppose it quickly. The last week of session begins on Monday the 10th and the Citizens of Missouri would be better off with this bill being killed than if it passes.

Please call the Senate and tell them to vote NO on SB795 and stop all these committees and task forces from being established in statute and ruling how independent agriculture can conduct itself. Let’s fight HSUS with facts instead of letting further consolidation of agriculture markets occur because we are afraid of this bunch of Horribly Sadistic Urban Sociopaths.

Find the Senate roster at

Genetically Modified Cows Die…

Yes, you read that right. Not cows that ATE GMO’s, but GMO cows themselves…….And hey, even better, they were crossed with humans!!! I know, people say that isn’t actually happening, but in reality, which is inevitably stranger than fiction, it has been happening for quite awhile. The following article doesn’t go into the history, just reports what has happened with some of these cattle.

http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/7141902/genetically-modified-cows-die-at-research-centre/

Three genetically modified cows born at the AgResearch centre at Ruakura, Hamilton, were born with ovaries that grew so large they caused ruptures and killed them.

The animals being used in a study in which AgResearch scientists were seeking human fertility treatments through GM cows’ milk.

AgResearch was now studying tissue from one of the three dead calves to try to find out what made the ovaries grow to the size of tennis balls rather than the usual thumbnail-size, the Weekend Herald reported today.

The newspaper obtained details of the deaths in an Official Information Act request and said it had reignited debate over the ethics of GM trials on animals.

AgResearch’s applied technologies group manager, Dr Jimmy Suttie, said the deaths were not a big deal and told the newspaper they were part of the learning process for scientists.

However, GE-Free NZ spokesman Jon Carapiet told the newspaper details of the calf trial showed the animal welfare committee overseeing AgResearch’s work was “miles away from the ethics and values of the community”.

The calves died last year, aged six months.

They were formed when human genetic code injected into a cow cell was added to an egg from a cow’s ovary and put into a cow’s uterus.
It was part of an experiment to see if the genetic code would enable the cows that were produced to produce milk containing compounds that could be used as a human fertility treatment.

Let’s All Be the Same!

If anyone doubted what I have been yammering about for years now on the international controlling our food supply and production, here is proof of that desire from someone with credentials….

Mike Robach, vice president of Corporate Food Safety and Regulatory Affairs for Cargill Inc., encouraged food processors to \push for an effective, modern, global food-safety system that would harmonize efforts from farm to fork and not simply make minor fixes to the current state of affairs.

Robach, speaking in today’s keynote session to attendees of the 2010 Food Safety Summit in Washington, D.C., explained that it is time to modernize food safety, both the systems and the standards, and called for involvement of all the stakeholders in the reform process — industry, consumers, government and academia.

“Without a clear vision forward, it’s impossible to build an effective, modern, global food-safety system,” he said.

Robach believes the federal government and Congress are committed to fixing the food-safety system, but he is concerned that all the current legislation does is patch an antiquated system that is further constrained by the structure of the USDA/FDA framework in place. He says that if we are to reform food safety, then we should analyze all aspects of food safety, to make sure that standards and regulations that have been in place for decades are still valid and meet the needs of the system.

Essential to the process is an improved partnership between the public and private sectors. Robach says that each of us plays a role in driving these partnerships forward.

“Neither sector can drive harmonization of the food-safety system alone,” he said. “Nor can the government, even though sometimes it appears to think it can.”

The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) has begun to build a bridge toward this path forward to harmonization, and Robach believes partnerships such as these will be necessary for reform to be far-reaching and successful.

Some of the key concepts Robach believes must be part of the reform include:

* the need for international recognition of the new standards, which must be based on science and risk
* results must allow flexibility for companies to achieve health objectives, rather than being prescriptive (Robach wants new standards to be objective-based, which would promote innovation by the industry, rather than a “how to” type of standard)
* use CODEX, OIE and IPPC as a basis for standardization
* international accreditation for audit schemes is necessary
* surveillance and rapid response must be improved via better relationships and collaboration by the industry with public-health agencies
* oversight must be focused on farm to fork, not simply the processing level
* reform must involve ALL stakeholders

Robach believes that without harmonization, any reform will not go the distance and stand the test of time.

“If people have different measurements of food safety, it’s too confusing for consumers,” he added. “But we cannot let food safety interfere with global trade.”

A global food-safety system would ensure a supply of safe food around the world at all times

JBS- Canning More Americans

Some of you may be familiar with the Brazilian company JBS S.A. and the fact that it IS the biggest meat packer in the world and recently was allowed to purchase Pilgrim’s Pride here in the US. They went into business with the Brazilian government (again) and sold their debentures on the stock exchange to pay for Pilgrim’s Pride. A few months ago, when the purchase was completed, they laid off a bunch of workers from the company. Now they are closing the company headquarters in Pittsburg, Texas and dismissing more Americans. They will be centralizing their administrative efforts on this continent in their offices in Greeley, Colorado.

This may not seem substantial, but it truly is.

The fact of the matter is that JBS now is taking over Australia, the US, and I heard Russia in the meat sector. As a multi national corporation, they are interested in the bottom line, and that’s really all. They don’t have nationalities and loyalties as a corporation. The fact that Tyson recently stated their plans to open a facility in Argentina as opposed to the US because they can hire people for total overal costs of $3 per hour there as opposed to $15 per hour here should spark one’s thinking. If we end up off-shoring all of agriculture, we will eventually be in the position of easily being starved out here.

Already 65% of produce is imported along with 80% of seafood. The official numbers indicate approximately 70% of our food is imported.

Remember kids, No Farmers, No Food.

We are losing our ability to produce anything except hot air here due to free trade, agency regulatory actions, lack of access to markets, too many constraints on direct trade, and failure to enforce the laws regarding anti-trust and monopolies on the part of the agencies charged with those enforcements.

This action by JBS (canning employees) was not unanticipated, but it is yet another blow to our ability to provide for ourselves. Wait until they move 70% of the production out of the country. Then we’ll have some real fun.

====MeatingPlace.com has a members only policy for articles. This is where the article copied below came from. It is copied exactly as it was written en toto…

Industry News – PM
Pilgrim’s Pride to close HQ, Atlanta offices; plans layoffs

By Lisa M. Keefe on 4/12/2010

Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. announced Monday that it will close its corporate headquarters building in East Texas and a satellite corporate office in Atlanta, resulting in total layoffs of 213 employees. Both offices are expected to close within about 60 days.

Many Pilgrim’s Pride employees at the two corporate offices have been offered positions elsewhere in the company. Still, the company expects to eliminate 158 jobs at its headquarters in Pittsburg, Texas, and 55 jobs in Atlanta. Layoffs are expected to begin in mid-June.

The closings are billed as part of the company’s ongoing integration with JBS USA, which assumed a majority stake in the poultry processor at the end of 2009. Those offices’ functions are being moved to JBS USA’s headquarters in Greeley, Colo.

The announcement comes three months after Pilgrim’s Pride laid off 230 people from offices in Texas, Atlanta and Virginia. (See Pilgrim’s Pride cuts 230 jobs as JBS takes over, on Meatingplace, Jan. 5, 2010.)

None of the jobs to be eliminated in June are production-related, and the processing facilities and operations will not be affected.

========================

Previous Older Entries Next Newer Entries