Monsanto Busted Doing Their Own “Independent Reviews”

It came out several months ago when Monsanto was forced to release emails in the lawsuit for cancer deaths in California, that Monsanto definitely KNEW there were problems, and worked to both control the studies and cover up what they knew to be the truth about their cancer causing, genderbending, bee destroying, genetic aberrations.

Now that knowledge is becoming mainstream. And they can’t seem to afford to buy everyone off any longer. Not that they don’t have the vast majority of the US House and Senate working to do their bidding.

Here’s an excerpt from a heavily linked article at Bloomberg today. Please be sure to share it:

Monsanto Was Its Own Ghostwriter for Some Safety Reviews

Academic papers vindicating its Roundup herbicide were written with the help of its employees.
August 9, 2017, 3:00 AM CDT

Monsanto Co. started an agricultural revolution with its “Roundup Ready” seeds, genetically modified to resist the effects of its blockbuster herbicide called Roundup. That ability to kill weeds while leaving desirable crops intact helped the company turn Roundup’s active ingredient, the chemical glyphosate, into one of the world’s most-used crop chemicals. When that heavy use raised health concerns, Monsanto noted that the herbicide’s safety had repeatedly been vetted by outsiders. But now there’s new evidence that Monsanto’s claims of rigorous scientific review are suspect.

Dozens of internal Monsanto emails, released on Aug. 1 by plaintiffs’ lawyers who are suing the company, reveal how Monsanto worked with an outside consulting firm to induce the scientific journal Critical Reviews in Toxicology to publish a purported “independent” review of Roundup’s health effects that appears to be anything but. The review, published along with four subpapers in a September 2016 special supplement, was aimed at rebutting the 2015 assessment by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) that glyphosate is a probable human carcinogen. That finding by the cancer-research arm of the World Health Organization led California last month to list glyphosate as a known human carcinogen. It has also spurred more than 1,000 lawsuits in state and federal courts by plaintiffs who claim they contracted non-Hodgkin lymphoma from Roundup exposure.

Monsanto disclosed that it paid Intertek Group Plc’s consulting unit to develop the review supplement, entitled “An Independent Review of the Carcinogenic Potential of Glyphosate.” But that was the extent of Monsanto’s involvement, the main article said. “The Expert Panelists were engaged by, and acted as consultants to, Intertek, and were not directly contacted by the Monsanto Company,” according to the review’s Declaration of Interest statement. “Neither any Monsanto company employees nor any attorneys reviewed any of the Expert Panel’s manuscripts prior to submission to the journal.”

Monsanto’s internal emails tell a different story. The correspondence shows the company’s chief of regulatory science, William Heydens, and other Monsanto scientists were heavily involved in organizing, reviewing, and editing drafts submitted by the outside experts. At one point, Heydens even vetoed explicit requests by some of the panelists to tone down what one of them wrote was the review’s “inflammatory” criticisms of IARC.

“An extensive revision of the summary article is necessary,” wrote that panelist, John Acquavella, an epidemiologist at Aarhus University in Denmark, in a February 2016 email attached to his suggested edits of the draft. Alarmed, Ashley Roberts, the coordinator of the glyphosate papers for Intertek, forwarded Acquavella’s note and edits to Heydens at Monsanto, with the warning: “Please take a look at the latest from the epi(demiology) group!!!!”

Heydens reedited Acquavella’s edits, arguing in six different notes in the draft’s margin that statements Acquavella had found inflammatory were not and should not be changed, despite the author’s requests. In the published article, Heydens’s edits prevailed. In an interview, Acquavella says that he was satisfied with the review’s final tone. According to an invoice he sent Monsanto, he billed the company $20,700 for a single month’s work on the review, which took nearly a year to complete…..(read the rest here)

I tried to tell everyone….NAIS Never Went Away-it simply had a name change

The NIAA and the infamous Neil Hammerschmidt are at it again. Having an expensive meeting to figure out how to subject livestock growers to “enforcement” measures for RFID tagging of livestock. They are after the cattle, as they always have been.

Maybe they should remember the nooses on the livestock trailer with their agency name on them the last time they tried this in Colorado. If you are interested, here is the release from the fascist group, NIAA:

Exceptional Agenda Set for Strategy Forum on Livestock Traceability

The National Institute for Animal Agriculture (NIAA) announces an impressive agenda for the upcoming day and a half Strategy Forum on Livestock Traceability which they will co–host with the US Animal Health Association (USAHA) in Denver, CO in September.

The Strategy Forum will kick off with an introduction from Dr. Tony Forshey, Board Chair, National Institute for Animal Agriculture and Dr. Boyd Parr, United States Animal Health Association.

Mr. Matt Deppe, Executive Director, Iowa Cattlemen’s Association (Invited) is scheduled to moderate the Strategy Forum as first day continues with updates on the USDA Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) program and feedback on public meetings from USDA APHIS Veterinary Services Cattle Health Staff/Animal Disease Traceability Veterinarian Dr. Sunny Geiser–Novotny and Dr. Aaron Scott.

Mr. Neil Hammerschmidt, Animal Disease Traceability, Program Manager, will discuss “ADT Next Step Considerations.” After a networking lunch, a panel discussion with State Veterinarians from around the US, will examine “Enforcement Rules –Successes and Opportunities.” Dr. Nevil Speer and Dr. Justin Smith will moderate more panel discussions on “Implications for Livestock Markets ” and “Making Standards and Technology Work.”

Mr. Paul Laronde, Tag & Technology Manager, Canadian Cattle Identification Agency , will open the second day of the Strategy Forum with a review of the Canadian Traceability Forum. Mr. Randy Munger, Mobile Information & Animal Disease Traceability Veterinarian, USDA / APHIS / STAS will speak about “Using RFID to Advance Traceability.”

The final panel discussion will consider “Implications for Livestock Used for Rodeo, Fairs & Exhibitions.”

The Strategy Forum on Livestock Traceability will be held September 26 –27, 2017 at the DoubleTree by Hilton, Denver–Stapleton North, Denver, Colorado. View the entire AGENDA HERE. Register HERE.

Computers Can Change Your Memories….Part of Mandela Effect Equation?

There is an article about how computers can now alter your memory and your thoughts. It’s heavily linked and very worth reading.

In my opinion, this is likely part of the Mandela equation. And before people begin asserting that those who recognize the effect are those who have had their memories wiped, I need to point a few things out. First, there are a great number of residual residues indicating that those who recognize the effect are recalling a lot of things correctly. Like the Lion and the Lamb figurine with Isaiah 11:6 on it. Microfiche ads for Fruit Loops and Charles Schultz, and James Earl Jones saying “Luke, I am your father….and your uncle” on a night show interview. Letterman introducing Sally Fields…Lots of things. And granted, some things people think are evidence of the effect are actually incorrect recollections.

Please be aware that this effect is very unlikely to have a singular causative component. My theory is  very, very sci-fi and woo woo, but there are actually patents for everything I am about to set forward as my theory of what is causing the Mandela effect. But first, here is the article that came out in the Independent yesterday. Please do read it and then if you like, continue to read what I think may be happening with the effect many are experiencing. Here it is:

New computers could delete thoughts without your knowledge, experts warn

brain-anatomy-2.jpg

Thou canst not touch the freedom of my mind,” wrote the playwright John Milton in 1634.

But, nearly 400 years later, technological advances in machines that can read our thoughts mean the privacy of our brain is under threat.

Now two biomedical ethicists are calling for the creation of new human rights laws to ensure people are protected, including “the right to cognitive liberty” and “the right to mental integrity”.

Scientists have already developed devices capable of telling whether people are politically right-wing or left-wing. In one experiment, researchers were able to read people’s minds to tell with 70 per cent accuracy whether they planned to add or subtract two numbers. 

Facebook also recently revealed it had been secretly working on technology to read people’s minds so they could type by just thinking

And medical researchers have managed to connect part of a paralysed man’s brain to a computer to allow him to stimulate muscles in his arm so he could move it and feed himself.

The ethicists, writing in a paper in the journal Life Sciences, Society and Policy, stressed the “unprecedented opportunities” that would result from the “ubiquitous distribution of cheaper, scalable and easy-to-use neuro-applications” that would make neurotechnology “intricately embedded in our everyday life”. (Click here for the rest of the article)

So, back to how I find this to be very likely to be part of the Mandela or Quantum Effect. First of all, while it would probably be less upsetting to people, we are not in an alternate dimension, nor have we slipped time. Were either of those things the case, there would be no residuals available. We have these things out there that make it impossible for all of us to have “jumped” a dimension or time line.

So, what I think is this…Put on your woo woo goggles, okay?

Satan has to use technology to try to achieve the omniscience, omnipotence and omnipresence of the Most High YHVH. The level of technology that we now have is beyond Orwellian. There are psycho and technotronic weapons, lots of them actually. The most famous is probably the Voice to Skull tech. You can research this on your own if you like. If you have the stomach for it, you can then look into “targeted individuals”.

Then there is “smart dust”, and nanobots and nanoparticles that can be used as antennae, probably both for receiving and transmitting. (Please note the last link was from 2005). So these things are not actually theorized any longer, but existent. And a great number of chemtrail researchers have found nanobots and particles in residue. So as sci-fi as it sounds, since they are in food, and in the air, it is entirely possible that there is a type of interface that can occur with quantum computers through these microscopic particles. Here is a video of Geordie Rose of D Wave talking about their older version of the D Wave Quantum Computer that Google, NASA and Cern all have…They may actually have even stronger capacities as it is reported that D Wave has developed a “next gen” quantum computer. Here is the 20 minute video on the D Wave-this is from 2013:

Then we have Cern, happily trying to open portals into other dimensions and recreate the big bang and release things called “strangelets” that are created by firing up the accelerators to insane levels and watching (maybe) what happens. Essentially messing with the very fabric of the universe. I will admit that what Cern does is actually well over my head in scientific comprehension, but philosophically, I grasp it quite well. Anthony Patch appears to have the best handle on what Cern is doing of people who are not actually involved in Cern, and probably have non-disclosure agreements as well. And to be honest, quantum physics is really like philosophy colliding with photons and creating potentialities that may or may not be observable as the simple observation of something changes it’s action. (Double slit experiment or “if a tree falls in a forest and no one hears it, does it make a sound?”)

Here is a video that at about 2:13 shows “Mandela” on a placard around a Cern physicists neck. I went to the trouble to write him regarding what the signs he was wielding in the video actually meant, but he didn’t write back.  It’s an interesting video and was done in November of 2014….Prior to the internet telling us that Cern associates actually created the internet:

 

And then there is the increasingly unopposed assertion that your brain is actually pretty much a quantum computer. A lot of this has to do with what exactly consciousness is, or isn’t. Very intriguing:

So….Here is what I think in a sci-fi nutshell.

I think that there is an interface between nanoparticles, Cern, quantum AI computing that is manifesting changes on the quantum level of physical objects and historic occurrences. I think Cern opens up a potential pathway for the AI quantum computers to mess around with our reality on a quantum level and do nearly complete editing of things in the physical and also, through nanoparticles to rewrite many people’s memories of things and very significantly minimize evidence of a change occurring and cause people to simply NOT recall anything different than what the new paradigm desires to put forth as the current truth. I believe this is all demonically directed and that the people involved in the various parts of the equation that are changing provable reality are not actually cognizant of everything that is being done.

Since the brains of people are all individually different in some ways, it appears that the overwriting of memories is not something that can be done with 100% certainty. Just as there are approximately 20% of people that cannot be hypnotized, there are maybe 30% of humanity that cannot have their memories readily overwritten by the AI controlled quantum realignment. But they could improve their tech….I hope not.

I’m sure that I will get a rash of negative comments regarding my theory, and I have officially crossed the line beyond caring. There may be more things in this “matrix” than the ones I have isolated above, I am willing to continue to look. However, what I am concerned about is that now that the first article referenced above is effectuating disclosure of nothing less than computer enhanced mind control, that people who lack the ability to overcome the synthetic overwriting of memories may be subject to believing lies that they otherwise would readily detect. I think this is possibly an avenue for a type of “zombie apocalypse” if you will, where people will be fully convinced in their own minds of “facts” that have no basis in actual, unadulterated reality.

I also think that the simple act of being aware of this may shield people from having their very own minds violated by technological “intelligence”. It’s a little twist on what is called the Hawthorne Effect. Being aware of a change in observation (everything we do is being subjected to algorithm measurements and predictive behaviors predicated upon those algorithms) might very well make the desired outcome of those who want to mess with our minds much less effective.

Your thoughts are welcome, but please don’t go into the “you’re a moron” realm. If you do, I will delete it. If you simply disagree and state why clearly and concisely, that is completely fine!

Save

Monsanto Emails Show They Knowingly Colluded to Hide Glyphosate Causes Cancer

Should anyone still think that GMO’s and Round Up aren’t seriously harmful, they need to read this article and go through all the links showing the intentional obscuring and falsification of studies on this disgusting chemical.

Below is an excerpt from the article, and the link is the heading.

Emails between the EPA & Monsanto now revealed (The contents are sickening!)

We should be able to trust that the food we buy is safe, but when the people in charge of that are working to keep unsafe chemicals on the market – we have a huge problem!

Along with so many of you and fellow activists, we have been spreading the truth about GMOs and hazardous chemicals used in conjunction with them like Roundup (glyphosate). This weedkiller isn’t just used on GMOs but on 70 different food crops in the U.S. – it’s in practically everything Americans eat. So, if glyphosate is causing cancer and other diseases, I want to know about it and get it out of our food – don’t you?

Stating the obvious: Monsanto makes billions off of Roundup sales, so they don’t want anyone to question its safety. Some never-before-seen confidential documents just released in a court case against Monsanto give us a glimpse into how they are working to influence the EPA (who is in charge of determining whether they are allowed to sell Roundup anymore) and undermine any efforts to ban its use. These documents show what many of us have known and suspected for quite some time… Monsanto is manipulating scientific research and has gotten some EPA officials on their side who seem to be helping them cover-up the health dangers of Roundup so they can keep it on the market.

Keep in mind… Monsanto and the EPA both do NOT want the public to see these internal emails! Why do you think that is?

While Monsanto is being sued in California by dozens of people who claim Roundup caused their non-hodgkin’s lymphoma, Monsanto had to provide over 6 million pages of internal emails and documents to the court and attorneys, and marked the majority of them as “confidential” so they’d be hidden from the public. When the plaintiffs asked the court to make the records public, both Monsanto and the EPA objected. The judge didn’t agree with their objections and threatened to sanction Monsanto if they continued trying to seal documents and found it in the best interest of the public to release them for all of us to see,“even if Monsanto doesn’t like what they say”.

The public interest group U.S. Right To Know is publishing these documents in their entirety on their website here. This is just the beginning and more are coming out. 

Here’s what we have uncovered in these documents so far…

  • Monsanto was in private talks with a top official at the EPA, Jess Rowland, who was in charge of evaluating the cancer risk of glyphosate for the EPA. Rowland was allegedly helping them stop another federal agency from investigating whether glyphosate causes cancer and told a Monsanto employee, “If I can kill this I should get a medal”. Rowland also signed off on the mysteriously leaked and deleted EPA memo which found glyphosate “not likely to be carcinogenic to humans”, which Monsanto touted as proof the EPA finds it safe.

  • Long-term EPA toxicologist Marion Copley accused EPA’s Rowland of playing “political conniving games with the science” and making decisions based on his “bonus” in favoring pesticide makers (such as Monsanto). Dr. Copley went on to allude that other EPA staff have conflicts of interest and may be taking bribes. She asserts that Anna Lowit (still at the EPA) intimidated staff to change their findings to favor the industry. Dr. Copley also stated, “It is essentially certain that glyphosate causes cancer.” 

  • A Monsanto employee proposed they could “ghost-write” portions of a scientific report and then just have hired scientists “sign their names so to speak”. The EPA would later use this report evaluate the safety of glyphosate. The reason they would do this is highly unethical – to make the report appear to have been prepared by independent scientists, when in reality Monsanto wrote it! This begs the question, how often do they do this? An email suggests they ghostwrote this report presented to EPA regulators in 2000, although no Monsanto employees are listed as authors.

  • Way back in 1999, Monsanto buried the findings of their own scientist (Dr. James Parry) who found glyphosate is genotoxic and recommended further testing. Internal emails show that Monsanto employees questioned whether Parry had “ever worked with industry before”, “hoped that it didn’t cost too much” and that they should hire a different expert who would be “influential with regulators” and help them with “outreach” efforts. Ha! They only want to hire scientists who will make findings in their favor to deceive our regulators.

  • Monsanto knows other compounds in Roundup such as NNG and 1, 4 Dioxane are toxic and can cause cancer as they acknowledged this with each other in emails mentioned in court docs: “If you talk to Kerry [Liefer, an EPA employee], I wouldn’t push the NNG issue too hard — don’t want to draw attention to the toxicity of our product”.

  • In another 2015 email, a toxicologist at Monsanto hinted that Rowland would be retiring from the EPA and that he’d be useful for their “ongoing glyphosate defense”. This just further shows that Rowland was in Monsanto’s back pocket all along and is a key player in helping them achieve their mission.

They are feeding us lies and these secrets are poisoning us!

Most Americans are eating glyphosate every day… No matter how healthy we eat or how much we try to protect ourselves from it, this weedkiller is being used on most major conventional food crops and is so rampant in our environment that it is contaminating virtually all of our food. It’s been found in honey, cereals, meat, drinking water, breast milk, infant formula, chips, cookies… the list goes on. Our government agencies (FDA and EPA) know this and are allowing corporations to poison Americans for profit. It’s truly disgusting!

Monsanto is stooping to corruption to continue selling their poisons. Everything from seeking to keep their correspondence with the EPA secret, to intimidating scientists at the WHO International Agency on Cancer (IARC) who found Roundup’s active ingredient glyphosate “probably carcinogenic”. A large body of peer reviewed research links glyphosate to cancer, reproductive problems, liver, kidney and skin cell damage, antibiotic-resistance, and more – but Monsanto doesn’t want the public to know the truth!

Glyphosate should be banned worldwide and consumers have the power to make this a reality. Here’s our ACTION PLAN:

  1. Choose to buy only certified organic food and products. This will hit Monsanto where it really hurts, their bottom line! Their best-selling products like Roundup and GMO seeds are banned on organic farms. If all farms were organic these products would bite the dust! This is voting with your dollars and is the most effective way to force change.
  2. Share this post with everyone you know! Expose their corruption. They should be shamed for this! Especially if you know anyone who is still eating non-organic food or using Roundup around their homes, make sure you get this information in their hands.
  3. Ask your favorite companies to test for glyphosate and get certified. Wouldn’t it be nice to know if the food you buy contains glyphosate? I have an exciting announcement! The Detox Project just launched a new “Glyphosate Residue Free Certification” program and will begin labeling products that have been tested and are free of glyphosate. I’ve partnered up with them to help spread the word – They are working with food manufacturers and grocery chains, so that soon we will see labels like this on some products – send this link to your favorite companies and ask them to go glyphosate free.

Everyone deserves to know exactly what they are eating and have access to safe, affordable food. My job will not be done until this is a reality. I’m so happy to have so many of you by my side and I know we can make this happen!

 


DEA Makes CBD Oil A Schedule 1–January 13, 2017

CBD oil, which is not at all psychoactive (doesn’t make anyone ‘high’) is now specifically listed as a Schedule 1 drug, meaning it has NO medicinal value and a high abuse rate. Lots of people have been using CBD for arthritis pain, migraines, seizures, rheumatism, tendonitis, and other things. For some people, it is the only thing that has helped them, and now, it is going to be illegal, by a rule.

Here is an article on it. This almost seems like a hail Mary attempt at asserting control over people’s right to self-determination on cannabis. Too many people now know that the only reason this is “controlled” is to control the health and -access to- well being that is definitely a human right.For some reason, many people seem to think that only doctors and pharmaceutical companies know how living beings should deal with the rigors of being alive.

It is complete tripe.

Here is the article with links to the rule and additional information:

DENVER — A cannabidiol hemp oil used by some families of children with seizures has been officially named a Schedule I drug by the DEA.

“Schedule I drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse,” the DEA says on its website.

That puts the oil in the same category as heroin, LSD, ecstasy, meth, peyote and marijuana.

The DEA published the details about the change in the Federal Register.

It applies to any “extract containing one or more cannabinoids that has been derived from any plant of the genus Cannabis,” the Federal Register posting said.

The change explains that the DEA is creating a new Administrative Controlled Substances Code Number for what it calls “Marihuana [sic] Extract.”

During the comment period for the new rule, one person asked for clarification of whether the new drug code would be applicable to cannabidiol (CBD).

The DEA responded to say any cannabis plant extract that contains CBD and no other cannabinoids will still fall within the new drug code.

Read the details about the new drug code here.

****Here is a very interesting and in depth analysis of the rule. The author believes the rule is void:

http://kightoncannabis.com/is-cbd-illegal-under-the-new-dea-marihuana-extract-rule-a-legal-analysis/#comment-3906

Government Agents In the Bundy Trial

For those who are appalled at the killing of LaVoy Finnicum and the categorization of the Malheur occupiers as “terrorists”, the following article will both give you additional insight and agitation. If you have additional articles that bring deeper clarity to the debacle in Oregon, please feel free to share links in the comment section.

Bundy Prosecutors Admit That Undercover Informants Outnumbered Defendants In Recent Trial

Source: Lew Rockwell – by Roger I. Roots, J.D., Ph.D.

For the past six weeks Oregonians have been treated to a political trial of the “Malheur 7” (Ammon Bundy, Ryan Bundy, Shawna Cox, Jeff Banta, David Fry, Neal Wampler and Ken Medenbach,). I was privileged to have a ringside seat at the trial as a volunteer researcher and paralegal for Ryan Bundy (who represents himself) at the trial.

As I write these words, the jury is out, considering whether the defendants conspired to prevent U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service or Bureau of Land Management officers from performing their duties at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in rural eastern Oregon. The Bundy brothers and other defendants are alleged to have participated in an “armed standoff” occupation of the Refuge during January 2016 (while protesting the unconstitutional occupation by the federal government itself over the Refuge and other public lands).

The trial has revealed an astounding brave new world of modern surveillance and surreptitious “law enforcement” techniques. Drones flew over and recorded much of what went on. FBI agents captured and monitored every phone number connected between every participant. A search warrant after the fact gave the government permission to surf through 36 Laptops, smartphones, flash drives and other devices to build the government’s case. The FBI turned the analysis of Facebook likes, dislikes, messages, and posts into a science, with multiple agents assigned to that social media alone.

Outside the Refuge, FBI, Oregon State Police, and other law enforcement agencies swarmed over the countryside.  Government snipers appeared on local rooftops. Barricades and barbed wire were erected to protect the school and courthouse from the alleged militia danger. Undercover FBI agents dressed as redneck militia members roamed through local stores and menaced the streets.

Money was spent at such an extravagant pace that one professional auditor told me that the dollar amounts should have themselves triggered a separate criminal investigation. The Feds have publicly claimed that the 41-day occupation caused at least “$6.9 million” in damages.At trial, prosecutors objected, however, to every request to examine such claims. “Irrelevant!” said the prosecution. (In the event that any defendants are convicted, the Justice Department will surely assert such dollar claims in a demand for ‘restitution.’)

And there were undercover government informants. Everywhere. Suspicions that the government’s narrative was largely erected with undercover agents were borne out during the first week of trial.  It was revealed by an Oregon State trooper that one of Ammon Bundy’s “bodyguards”—a man who drove him to his arrest—was an undercover informant.

Another informant (“Mama Bear”) was revealed when a defense lawyer subpoenaed her for the defense. The woman admitted that her entire trip to the Malheur Refuge was funded by the San Diego FBI office and that she was paid thousands of dollars to inform on the occupiers while helping out in the kitchen.

Each of these informants were revealed by accident. Federal prosecutors vociferously refused to provide the names of other informants—citing case law that holds such revelations may put informants in danger. Prosecutors even used secret information—not provided to the defense—to cross-examine “Mama Bear,” to the prejudice of the defendants.

For days, Marcus Mumford (attorney for Ammon Bundy) demanded more information about the extent of undercover informants. Mumford pointed to the fact that the defendants were charged with conspiracy, and no one can be convicted of conspiring with undercover government agents. (The trial was filled with unanswered questions about who brought and left ammunition and guns, who damaged property, and why some people but not others were charged.)

Finally the Justice Department stipulated (without naming any names) that at least nine occupiers were undercover informants; a number greater than the number of defendants on trial. (Heavily redacted documents in the hands of the defense suggest the number of informants was actually at least 15.)

Significantly, the prosecution’s most damning evidence collapsed at the end of the trial when it was revealed that the man who ran a militia shooting range at the Malheur Refuge was himself an undercover agent. Through the hard work of defense lawyers, “John Killman” was identified as a paid (“reimbursed,” he said) informant who traveled to the occupation at the behest of the government in a beat-up pickup truck tolead the occupiers in combat “safety” training.“Killman” had even trained defendant Jeff Banta to stop cars and pull out their drivers at gunpoint.

Stay tuned!

Mandela/Quantum Effect- Is this the Strong Delusion?

Many people are saying that those who perceive the Quantum effect (Mandela is really insufficient) are suffering from serious memory lapses, lack intelligence, can’t tell their own perceptions from reality, are retards, idiots, morons, under demonic spells, victims of mind control, or even much more ugly and insulting names. Many of the more heinous insults come from self-described “good Christians”. Evidently they are unaware of what scripture teaches (as of this writing) about the fruits of the spirit.

Why is this so important that I keep going on and on about it? Because now, Yeshua Messiah is instructing His followers in Luke 19:27, a parable of the Kingdom of Heaven, to “But those mine enemies which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither and slay them before me.”  He NEVER said that. It is a lie. It was either “cast them from my presence” or “remove them from before me”. This is across ALL translations in English.

In Spanish translations, it is often even worse. Copied below is the scripture in Spanish telling His followers to “behead them in front of me.”

Y también a aquellos mis enemigos que no querían que yo reinara sobre ellos, traedlos acá, y degolladlos delante de mí.

All of you “teachers” and “preachers” of scripture who say nothing has changed in any scriptures, and that those of us who note these changes are ANY of the above insulting names or attributes, I am begging you NOW to repent and fall on your face before the Almighty Creator Yahuah, and beg for the eyes to see and the ears to hear. I don’t want you to be in the place that Yeshua said many would find themselves in Matthew 7: 22-23.

“Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in your name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then I will profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me ye that work iniquity.”

To me, it seems this is definitely the beginning of the strong delusion. It’s going to get worse, too. Remember that in John 16:2-3 Yeshua told us before hand that they would kill us thinking they do YHVH a service. So those of you who see these changes, be strong and gird yourself. Especially believers that know there have been some substantive changes in scripture- don’t be afraid. Read John 16:2-3, He told us beforehand. There has never been a time when it is more important to cry aloud and spare not, and let others know that the time is short.

For those who don’t see any of the changes at all, and for those who see changes but are not yet believers in Yeshua Messiah, please seek Him. If you don’t do so soon, you may not be able to even make a decision to try in the future. It’s like the Ministry of Truthlessness is taking over. Everything is becoming a lie and a fraud, and people are not even going to be able to trust their own minds and memories as this worsens.

Here are many pictures of things showing some of the more common changes that have occurred. They show how some of the memories of people are indeed telling the truth. There is a little commentary by each picture.

The video cassette shows what WAS the spelling of the Berenstein Bears

The video cassette shows what WAS the spelling of the Berenstein Bears

When the video tape is played, the film has changed, on the shelf, to show BerenstAIn Bears. This is the earliest known effect.

When the video tape is played, the film has changed, on the shelf, to show BerenstAIn Bears. This is the earliest known effect.

Then there is the famous movie line from Forrest Gump that is now, on VHS and DVD changed to “Momma always said life was like a box of chocolates.” It used to be “Life is like a box of chocolates” and here is proof off my own shelf:

VHS tape from the 90's

VHS tape from the 90’s

And our DVD from about 2005

And our DVD from about 2005

Then there is the issue of Looney Toons. Why would there still be Tiny Toons, but no Looney Toons? Why wouldn’t it be Tiny Tunes? If you are capitalizing on name association, wouldn’t it make sense to follow the name? And people remember Looney Toons…some ebay clippings show it is very deeply ingrained in many.

1976 Looney Toons...but Tunes

1976 Looney Toons…but Tunes

Note the title of the auction has Looney Toons in it even though the cards clearly read Tunes. No one spells iTunes iToons. Hmm?

Why not Tiny Tune?

Why not Tiny Tune?

And a pic of the search screen followed by a newspaper clipping from the 90’s…after the deck of cards was made:

CAM00842CAM00828Then there is the advertisement for Fruit Loops. However, if you look for a cereal box that says “Fruit Loops” you will never find one.

Fruit Loops-lightly highlighted

Fruit Loops-lightly highlighted

Last for today…the restaurant that got so much flack for standing on biblical principles. It was Chic Fil A, but it is now Chick Fil A. I actually remember Chik Fil A, but to be honest, I never ate there, so I cannot be positive. I know it was spelled in a kitchy way though. But most say it was Chic Fil A, and there is a lot of residual evidence for that, and here is a little more:

Chic Fil A. Not Chick Fil A.

Chic Fil A. Not Chick Fil A.

Also, the Peanuts cartoon creator’s name has changed. Below are pics of a newspaper that was pre-change, and a book we have here that shows the name change from Schultz to Shulz.

Newspaper that missed the change

Newspaper that missed the change

CAM00860

The figurine above is from the 1840’s and says “The young lion shall lie down with the Lamb” Isaiah 11:6.

So there is a little residual evidence for you. This could not be time travel because all evidence would be wiped entirely if it were. While there could be memories of a difference, there would be NO proof that it actually was different as evidenced above.

We are here, in the same place we have always been, and our time is still running in the direction Yahweh designed us to operate in. My youngest isn’t shrinking and getting ready to go back to the womb. People in my life haven’t died in my mind only. Those who know me, still know me.

This is not a conspiracy theory. What is happening is actually happening even though it sounds completely crazy and weird. Things on our shelves are changing. These are things we have had for years in many cases. We are not talking about new releases or new translations here. Yet aside from many others having the same recollection as ourselves, the physical evidence isn’t that readily available. But there is some there.

I hope that I have been able to help some of you understand that this isn’t a joke. To me, the most important thing is scripture changing. I hope you understand why….Shalom!

Save

Previous Older Entries