July 7, 2019 — Gary Null & Richard Gale have documented that Google now has a pharmaceutical division headed by GlaxosSmithKline’s former chairman of its global vaccine business. Null & Gale write:
Google today is not only a weapon for promoting the pharmaceutical agenda but now also a drug company itself. During the past six years, Google’s parent company Alphabet has launched two pharmaceutical companies. In 2013, it founded Calico, run by Genentech’s former CEO Arthur Levinson. Calico operates an R&D facility in the San Francisco Bay Area for the discovery of treatments associated with age-related diseases. Two years later, Alphabet founded Verily Life Sciences (previously Google Life Sciences). Both pharma companies are partnering with other drug corporations. Recently, Verily has partnered with the European pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline to form a new drug company, Galvani Bioelectronics for the development of “bioelectronic medicines.” The collaboration is costing the companies $715 million, and the new firm is being chaired by Glaxo’s former chairman of its global vaccines business. (emphasis added) http://prn.fm/gary-null-show-wikipedia-silicon-valleys-cult-medical-misinformation-07-01-19/
If you have livestock, you very well may have the cure for at least 4 types of cancer in humans just sitting about in your Pet Meds. Safeguard and Panacur. Both are fenbendazole wormers and fenbendazole has been found to be effective against some lung cancer, prostate cancer, lymphoma and glioblastoma.
Sadly, cancer is incredibly common, and chemotherapy often kills the person. We know that there are many natural cures, dandelion root, Essiac Tea, which is a combination of 4 herbs, Reishi mushrooms (usually combined with Turkey Tail as well) and, of course, cannabis.
Below is a link to a rather in depth article on fenbendazole with links. Well worth the read!
My friend Joe sent this to me, and it is a pretty good article with a good deal of links that should be helpful to people as this goes into effect.
The article is linked in the headline, and there is just an excerpt for you below.
Yes, I scoff. The FDA, whose approved medications kill thousands of people every year is now going to make produce safe. Ugh. But, we’ll see how it pans out in the very near future.
USDA Agricultural Marketing Service staff performing a GAP audit; voluntary, third-party services that verify that farms are following food safety practices and recommendations from the FDA. Photo credit: Iowa Food Hub.
Food safety inspections on produce farms are beginning this month, but there are still questions as to what the first round of Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Produce Safety Rule inspections will look like. The fact that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will be regulating farms for the first time is concerning for many produce farmers who have never interacted with FDA before on a regular basis. Adding to the anxiety for some producers, is the fact that this will be the first time in history that they will have to deal with regular inspections on their farm.
In order to help producers prepare, FDA has provided a preview of what a produce farm inspection might look like. Using the information provided by FDA and our own additional resources, the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC) details in this post what produce farmers might expect from the upcoming inspections, and provides some best practice tips for getting through the process as painlessly as possible.
What Types of Inspections Might Occur?
There are several different types of inspections that might occur under the new FSMA regulations. Firstly, there will be a routine inspection for all farms covered under the Produce Safety Rule to ensure that they are in compliance. Routine inspections begin this year; in some states, inspections for larger farms will begin this month. For small farms (farms with a three year average of annual produce sales between $250,000-$500,000), routine inspections begin in Spring 2020.
There are also other reasons an FDA official or state regulator might show up on a farm. An unannounced inspection may be conducted if:
There are “past issues” the farm has not corrected
There is a need to follow-up on any corrections recommended during a routine inspection
If a farm fails to respond to an inspector’s call to schedule a routine inspection within five business days
If there is a complaint, recall, or foodborne outbreak investigation linked to a farm
Sometimes words are just not enough. The article itself is horrifying. Linked, sourced, and horrifically, true. I’ll not watch the video myself.
Link to the article in the title. This is only about half of the article:
Planned Parenthood Kept
Babies Alive in order to Harvest Brain & Heart
In an undercover video, a former technician for a tissue-harvesting company details how an aborted baby was kept alive so that its heart could be harvested at a California Planned Parenthood facility, raising more legal questions about the group’s practices.
Holly O’Donnell, a former blood and tissue procurement technician for the biotech startup StemExpress, also said she was asked to harvest an intact brain from the late-term, male fetus whose heart was still beating after the abortion.
A StemExpress supervisor “gave me the scissors and told me that I had to cut down the middle of the face. And I can’t even describe what that feels like,” said Ms. O’Donnell, who has been featured in earlier videos by the Center for Medical Progress, a pro-life group that previously had released six undercover clips involving Planned Parenthood personnel and practices.
David Daleiden, the video project leader, said the undercover footage and interviews show that fetuses are sometimes delivered “intact and alive” before their organs are harvested.
The federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002 says that when a child is born alive, including having a beating heart, he or she is a legal person and has a right to lifesaving medical care.
California law also prohibits any kind of experimentation on a fetus with a discernible heartbeat, said the Center for Medical Progress, which is calling for the federal government to cease its $500 million a year support to Planned Parenthood and for it to be investigated.
“Today’s video is especially gruesome, and it shows, once again, the barbarity of what takes place at Planned Parenthoodclinics across the country,” said Rep. Joseph R. Pitts, Pennsylvania Republican and chairman of the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on health, one of several congressional panels investigating Planned Parenthood.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz, Utah Republican and chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said Wednesday that all the videos are “disturbing,” and his committee’s investigation will look into whether “any federal funding supported transactions involving fetal tissue.”
“Top-level employees of Planned Parenthood admit to changing their procedures to harvest intact bodies of unborn children for body-part trafficking,” said Rep. Trent Franks, Arizona Republican and chairman of the House Judiciary subcommittee on the Constitution and civil justice. (read the rest here)
An Open Letter to Legislators Currently Considering Vaccine Legislation from Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD
Dear Legislator:
My name is Tetyana Obukhanych. I hold a PhD in Immunology. I am writing this letter in the hope that it will correct several common misperceptions about vaccines in order to help you formulate a fair and balanced understanding that is supported by accepted vaccine theory and new scientific findings.
Do unvaccinated children pose a higher threat to the public than the vaccinated?
It is often stated that those who choose not to vaccinate their children for reasons of conscience endanger the rest of the public, and this is the rationale behind most of the legislation to end vaccine exemptions currently being considered by federal and state legislators country-wide.
You should be aware that the nature of protection afforded by many modern vaccines – and that includes most of the vaccines recommended by the CDC for children – is not consistent with such a statement.
I have outlined below the recommended vaccines that cannot prevent transmission of disease either because they are not designed to prevent the transmission of infection (rather, they are intended to prevent disease symptoms), or because they are for non-communicable diseases.
People who have not received the vaccines mentioned below pose no higher threat to the general public than those who have, implying that discrimination against non-immunized children in a public school setting may not be warranted.
1. IPV (inactivated poliovirus vaccine) cannot prevent transmission of poliovirus. (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #1). Wild poliovirus has been non-existent in the USA for at least two decades. Even if wild poliovirus were to be re-imported by travel, vaccinating for polio with IPV cannot affect the safety of public spaces. Please note that wild poliovirus eradication is attributed to the use of a different vaccine, OPV or oral poliovirus vaccine. Despite being capable of preventing wild poliovirus transmission, use of OPV was phased out long ago in the USA and replaced with IPV due to safety concerns.
2. Tetanus is not a contagious disease, but rather acquired from deep-puncture wounds contaminated with C. tetani spores. Vaccinating for tetanus (via the DTaP combination vaccine) cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is intended to render personal protection only.
Apparently this Twitter account did not belong to Dr. Pry. So…DOOOM Off! But he does want to encourage everyone to be prepared because it could indeed happen at any time.
Now, have a good weekend and make sure you are at least relatively prepped.
Okay. The man’s name is Dr. Peter Vincent Pry. He has a bunch of accolades. He also qualifies the warning with a “may”. But in good conscience, I must pass this on.
Text of Tweet:
Dr. Peter Vincent Pry
Dr. Peter Vincent Pry
@PeterVincentPry
To be as concise and succinct as possible, I must implore everyone who sees this to do all of the following, as quickly as possible:
Stockpile food, water and the means to acquire / purify much, much more. Prepare for an imminent situation that may impact us all, coast to coast
11:03 AM · Jan 3, 2019 · Twitter for Android
I’m not a space weather person, but those who are have said the magnetosphere is very weak right now, so it could be a solar flare, or a small detonation that could elicit issues. I don’t know.
So, there you have it. Please be safe, and do not panic, but don’t be dismissive. He’s never put anything like this out previously.
The video is not something you actually have to watch, but you should definitely listen to it. Thei is an interview from Sean at SGT report with Doctor Roby Mitchell who is a western medicine trained doctor that has fully embraced “alternative” medicine, which is real medicine that actually heals people.
If you want to keep taking prescriptions and manage symptoms, then don’t watch this. If you actually desire to be well, this is something you need to listen to. Awesome only begins to describe it!
This is an excellent article on essential oils and what to use for help in Lyme disease. We have recently learned that while we thought my husband had RA (rheumatoid arthritis) it appears that all of that is actually a coinfection from Lyme disease.
Sadly, when one does a cursory search on Lyme, one is led to believe that just an extended course of doxycycline or tetracycline will fix one right up. Well, that is NOT the case. And if you have Lyme, it is very difficult to actually get confirming tests. It’s more like a plethora of symptoms that are often diagnosed as a basket of other ailments. Here are a few symptoms, not all by any means…
Fatigue, heart palpitations, muscle spasms, muscle cramps, brain fog, sudden anger, inability to focus or remember, joint pain, depression, difficulty sleeping, weakness, exhaustion, stomach upset, IBS, circulation issues, generally being very cold, joint malformation as in RA, candida over growth, clammy skin, weight loss, rashes, and more. These are just the ones that we are contending with at this time.
Additionally, although the article below doesn’t address this, it is now certain that ticks are not the only insect that transmits Lyme. Fleas and mosquitos do as well. Also, Lyme can transmit from one person in the home to others as it in body fluids. So it is a very real likelihood that a far greater number of people have Lyme than one could possibly consider just looking at it in a cursory fashion.
We all need all the help we can get trying to keep ourselves and our loved ones in a place of good health. So in that spirit, I am sharing this article with you! Here’s an excerpt and the link in the headline….
Or, more effectively, copy this link and paste it in your browser:
Lyme disease is an increasingly common problem. Difficult to both detect and treat, researchers are constantly searching for new approaches to Lyme. The complexity of Lyme, and antibiotic resistance has led to the use of antimicrobials, like essential oils.
Lyme disease is complicated because it requires quick treatment, but can be hard to diagnose. Often, the result of limited treatment can be worsened symptoms, like brain issues such as memory loss and concentration problems. Antibiotics are no longer effective for Lyme, but essential oils can be a positive alternative.
Essential oils can help to both prevent Lyme disease and reduce the symptoms upon infection. They work by fighting bacteria, improving the immune system, and detoxifying the body. Antimicrobials kill bacteria, without allowing that bacteria to grow resistant to the substances used.
Research shows that essential oils can be a positive solution for fighting back against Lyme conditions in the brain. Not only can essential oils help to prevent some of the symptoms like brain fog, that happen to Lyme patients, but it can also help to remove Lyme from the brain through drainage.
One of the most powerful solutions for using essential oil in Lyme treatment is that it allows for the prevention of Lyme by repelling the insects most likely to transmit Lyme. Various oils can stop tick bites, and therefore reduce your chances of an infection. This means that you won’t have to fight back against Lyme in the long-run.
A Chinese researcher claims that he helped make the world’s first genetically edited babies — twin girls born this month whose DNA he said he altered with a powerful new tool capable of rewriting the very blueprint of life.
If true, it would be a profound leap of science and ethics.
A U.S. scientist said he took part in the work in China, but this kind of gene editing is banned in the United States because the DNA changes can pass to future generations and it risks harming other genes.
Many mainstream scientists think it’s too unsafe to try, and some denounced the Chinese report as human experimentation.
The researcher, He Jiankui of Shenzhen, said he altered embryos for seven couples during fertility treatments, with one pregnancy resulting thus far. He said his goal was not to cure or prevent an inherited disease, but to try to bestow a trait that few people naturally have — an ability to resist possible future infection with HIV, the AIDS virus.
So, in just a couple of days, Missouri will definitely pass some kind of initiative on cannabis. Marijuana for those who are unfamiliar with the history of the term.
Just an fyi for those who don’t know; the entire propaganda piece of “reefer madness” was predicated upon conflating racial issues with terminology. Everyone knew what “hemp” and cannabis were, but applying the idiomatic Mexican phrase of “marijuana” to the plant enabled the people pushing to keep cannabis from being used for health, wealth, and national security, into a position of control over the dialogue.
Rest assured, not one of these initiatives will do anything to enable people to get “high” without the potential of legal and severe monetary consequences.
Edited to add, that if anyone in my household were to come down with cancer, we would leaving Missouri and going to Colorado to begin treatments. And I know of several parents with children having leukemia and seizures who have had to leave Missouri to treat their child with effective types and applications of cannabis. It’s very, very sad that not one of these proposals will allow people to take control of their own health and the health of their loved ones. It’s actually heart breaking.
The initiative getting the largest amount of “airtime” is the biggest pile of manure that pretends to be helpful and will harm, hamper and probably actually cause loss of life. That is Amendment 3. It is being put forth by “Doctor and Lawyer: Brad Bradshaw. ” Notably, this amendment allows for a less than certain dosage to be available for people dying from cancer as the maximum allowable amount of cannabis. Again, for people who haven’t studied it out, to cure cancer, a person needs to have a POUND of flower reduced to oil in a month. Not the 3 ounces per month allowed by Amendment 3. It’s enough to make a person feel better without being able to actually heal them of the problem. In simple terms, enough to keep you happily sick and under the care of an industry that is not interested in curing you.
Just take a minute and think of all the people you know who have been diagnosed with cancer…Then take a moment to think about those you have lost to cancer. Is a “Constitutional amendment” that prevents you from doing what is right, normal and caring, worth sacrificing nearly all future cannabis patients over? You “can” if you you have successfully jumped through all the bureaucratic hoops set up by this 49 page amendment to the Missouri Constitution…AND if it is one of the ten of 700 to 1000 diseases deemed by the amendment to have been successfully treated by cannabis.
Actually, I don’t think anything more evil than Amendment 3 has been put forward as a “positive” solution for the well being of citizens ever. In any State. And even more repugnant, Amendment 3 pretends to give Missourians a payment to accept the unnecessary death or disability of their loved ones.
Sorry, but as a person who used to think that cannabis just helped people who were suffering from cancer “feel better” and then having become more thoroughly educated, I can’t see how it is even remotely beneficial to “allow” via a 49 page Constitutional Amendment, the right to be able to feel better while you die. Or for me, and most people, while your loved one dies an unnecessary death. Because the Constitutional Amendment will not allow you to access a therapeutic dose. It will allow you to feel better…NOT to be healed. Yes, a pound is an awful lot, but to cure cancer, that’s what it takes. Maybe even a couple of pounds.
Oh, and a fifteen percent tax to anyone allowed to purchase cannabis from a licensed dispensary from licensed growers, AFTER they have exhausted all pharmaceutical potentials, which usually fail in 7 years time, will be used to set up and pay an “advisory” board to continue to “think about and study” uses for a plant that the Creator put here for our healing!!!
Disgust doesn’t begin to summarize my thoughts on Amendment 3. Nothing could be more repugnant to those who value life than this almost 50 page monstrosity that will be up for a vote on November 6, 2018. So…You decide. Is $10 a year back worth the death of someone you love? There’s Amendment 3. Killing people softly while pretending to do good.
Amendment 2 is much less heinous than Amendment 3. But it still does many of the same things. It does allow for home grow, IF you have exhausted all pharmaceutical efforts and have one of the 10 conditions set forth…10. Out of at least 1,000 conditions positively treated via documented studies. 0ne tenth of health issues are actually ensconced in the Missouri Constitution by this amendment. Read that properly…Point .1000000 of conditions treated by studies.
In it’s favor, Amendment 2 is only 14 pages long. And it commits 4% of tax revenue from the allowable cannabis sales to go to Veteran’s Services. But the impediments to treatment have the same exhaustive and time sensitive issues as does Amendment 3. It also does not decriminalize cannabis, but qualifies some usage, and allows for 4 plants to be grown by those dying from the denial of effective treatment by cannabis.
Then there is the issue that both Amendment 2 and Amendment 3 could both pass as they are allowed to pass both at once. So then we have 2 Constitutional Amendments that conflict with each other, both of which inhibit individual access and personal accountability, ensconced in the Constitution only to be reconciled in court.
Just want to point out that the reconciliation itself can take 5 years. How many people lose their lives in that time frame?
Too many.
Entirely too many.
Then there is Prop C.
This is NOT a permanent amendment, so easier to change, but it isn’t without issues. The biggest positive is that it is not a permanent amendment to the Constitution. And that has issues as well. It does nothing to guarantee the rights endowed by the Creator to His creation the right to access herbs He said were good. It does allow for the treatment of 10 diseases, out of thousands. And it presents less difficult hoops to jump through for people literally dying from lack of the Nutraceuticals available in cannabis. 10 diseases of thousands with peer reviewed studies. Thousands, mind you.
So, if you know someone with Lyme disease, or diabetes, they can’t have this. Not under the “laws” prescribed by the initiatives.
From where I am sitting, as a person who has actually studied out cannabis and who has ZERO benefit in the continued prohibition or qualified access to this plant, I have to dice it this way. A “law” even though it is insufficient, is easier to fix than a Constitutional Amendment.
So I am against all of the initiatives. Why? Because every single one of them removes your ability to take care of yourself and places that primary human right directly into the hands of regulators and “lawmakers”.
And I am pro cannabis. By default, I am also pro people and pro life. Politically, the Federal government will have no choice but to deschedule cannabis completely within the next year or two. And I am not for people getting stoned and driving or giving cannabis to kids for any purpose other than medical reasons. I do believe that adults should have the right to enjoy it in the privacy of their own homes for recreational purposes.
Too many have heard of and witnessed the positive effects of Rick Simpson Oil. Too many have seen the positive life enhancements and positive environmental effects..”What IF Cannabis Cured Cancer?” And of course, What we could do with Hemp!”
People fail to comprehend that cannabis sativa is actually…Hemp…It also will get you high, but not as what we describe as “hemp”.
It is better to wait for righteousness than to agree to tyranny because we fail to trust in the truth. Missouri is better off holding to the Truth and waiting for the truth to prevail than to assent to severely constricted rights to eat something as helpful as echinacea.
Hemp seed, the flowers of which are not capable of intoxicating anyone, but are a perfect fatty acid food. Hemp seed itself can heal heart disease (actual) and high cholesterol (really made up since the discovery that statins) plus, they taste good.
Anyway, it seems clear that Missouri will do something on medical cannabis. What we do…may be entirely up to you.
All three of these measures could pass. And that would guarantee a couple of years in court at minimum.
They all require greater than 55% to be considered “pass” and they are all single line issues.For example, Amendment 3 gets a “pass” at 55% of vote, and Amendment 2 gets “pass” at 55% of vote. Then Prop C gets “pass” at 55%…and 2 Constitutional Amendments and a law are in conflict.
In the interim, maybe it’s your child…or maybe your spouse?… that dies because things weren’t clear in all the conflicting statutes and amendments.
That is beyond unjust. You “have the right to try”…QUALIFIER>>> if you have exhausted all pharmaceutical attempts at reconciling your problem.
So, Missouri could have 2 Constitutional Amendments that conflict with each other pass on the ballot; along with a law that conflicts. It’s a perfect storm of confusion.
From my point of view, it’s better to have no law than to have a bad law that needs to be corrected. Having participated in the attempt to get good and positive legislation passed to thwart a regulatory approach that was and IS harmful…It’s better to have nothing than to have “something” just because. To me, a Constitutional amendment regarding cannabis shouldn’t try to regulate via the Constitution. It should just make it free and legal and courts and legislatures could weigh in appropriately at the point of commerce.
Here are several less opinionated articles on the subject. Bottom line is that YOU have to decide. For me, I am voting “no” on all of them. But only once..:)
If you do nothing nothing else, please watch “Run from the Cure” which is the story of healing pioneer Rick Simpson and his rediscovery of the healing properties of cannabis oil.
Truth Farmer 
You must be logged in to post a comment.