List of Mandela Effect/Quantum Effect Scriptures

I said that I would get together a list of scriptures that have been altered by the Mandela/Quantum Effect, and so I have. The other day I included a link to a wiki page on this site, and then that page went down, and I guess the administrator changed to a forum format on the changes. There is a bit of a problem in that a lot of people who are familiar with scripture are not very familiar with KJV 1611.

CAM00815My first serious study bible a KJV 1611 Gideon’s Bible from about 1996 through 2000 is when I used this. Psalm 119 is pretty heavily highlighted here, and a questionable quantum effect scripture.

That version does indeed have a lot of weird words and names that are not in KJV, NKJV, KJV Authorized, or the various KJV study and reference bibles. It also always DID say “Easter” in Acts 12:4, where it should have said “passover” as reflected in the Greek. This is a perfect example of translator bias, and also a perfect rebuttal to people who claim that it is impossible for the devil to change scripture in anyway. The translators inserted a pagan holiday in place of the name of the actual moed (appointed time or feast) Israel is in covenant to keep.

Please be aware that the following list may be added to as this continues. And I am not saying that I know the entire KJV 1611 by rote, nor am I trying to be dismissive of things that people run across that strike them as odd. But there are things people are convinced are Mandela or Quantum changes that are actually peculiarities of a particular translation. And there are things that strike me as odd that I am unsure about. If I am uncertain, I won’t include it as a definitive effect, but as a question. Should there be a believer that seriously studied that passage or chapter that the Spirit confirms is a a believer, I will happily remove or add the questionable ones. It would be very helpful if people would name the type of scripture in which any changes they think may have occurred are contained.

Everything is in KJV and KJV 1611 unless it is followed by “ALL

Genesis 1:1 “In the beginning Yah created the heaven(s) and the earth”

Took out the s

Isaiah 11:6 – I don’t want to write it, but wolf has been inserted in the place of young lion and lion.     ALL

Isaiah 65:25—Same…Wolf in place of lion.  ALL
CAM00809What I remember is ” The lion and the lamb shall dwell together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock (or ox) and dust shall be the serpent’s meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the Lord.”

Matthew 7:1 “Judge not lest ye be judged”

Now, “Judge not that ye be not judged”

Matthew 6 9-13 “Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy Name. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread and forgive our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us, and lead us not unto temptation but deliver us from evil. For thine is the kingdom, and the power and the glory forever.”

“Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed by thy Name. They kingdom come, thy will be done in earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread and forgive our debts as we forgive our debtors, and lead us not unto temptation but deliver us from evil. For thine is the kingdom, and the power and the glory forever.”

Matthew 9:17 bottles instead of wineskins

Mark 2:22 bottles instead of wineskins.

Also bottles used instead of jars in the OT.

Luke 19:23 “bank” used to be to the exchangers, or those who lend.

Luke !9:27 “…and SLAY them before me“. Never, ever, said that. Some are saying “shew” some think mirror of Matthew and “bind them and cast them into the outer darkness.” Some think it was “remove them from my presence.” Initially, it seemed to me that it was a mirror of the parable in Matthew, and I thought “bind”, but I am now convinced that it actually was “remove them from my presence”. I studied Matthew more than Luke, but I knew it was effectively the same thing….and NOT “slay”, “kill” or “slaughter”.  ALL

Luke 6:49, a man that built his house upon the sand became “earth” in KJV and ground in NIV   ALL

John 8:32…..”and the truth shall set you free.” became “MAKE you free.

Mark 13:10….”the gospel must first be preached in among all nations” Preached is now “published“.

Luke 17:31…”In that day, he which shall be on the housetop, and his stuff in the house,….” Was possessions or belongings, never stuff.

Luke 1:35: …”therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee…”. Was holy one born of thee.

Numerous insertions of the word “stuff” in place of possessions or belongings.

Use of the word “matrix” in place of womb in Exodus and Numbers 5 times. (Strong’s 7358…twenty four times elsewhere the same word is translated as womb.)

Job 19:23: “Oh that my words were now written! Oh that they were printed in a book!” Used to read: “Oh that my words were now written! Oh that they were written in a scroll!”

Additionally:

Revelation Chapter 5: The word scroll has changed to book in KJV and KJV 1611. Importantly, “little book” always was in Revelation Chapter 10 and also it was always book in Chapter 22 of Revelation.

 

Questionable things:

Psalms 119:2…”Blessed are they that keep His testimonies…”. Across all translations, this says “testimonies” or directions, yet people remember it saying commandments. I am not certain. Testimonies does not hit me as wrong, and neither does “commandments” strike me as wrong. Above there is a picture of my first serious  bible (that I really wore out) with this scripture highlighted. Interestingly,  I had highlighted many of the scriptures that people are perceiving as affected. This is one of them. as is one of the “matrix” scriptures. Somewhere between 1996 and 2000 is when I used this bible.

Pounds versus talents in Luke…In KJV only…I think I remember it actually being pounds in the KJV. Penny was also used instead of denarius in KJV and KJV 1611. Perhaps some study bibles or reference bibles in KJV used denarius, but not all.

“Confederacy” instead of the word conspiracy in Isaiah 12. The word is Strong’s 7195 and every other place it appears it is translated as conspiracy.

Luke 12:24…”ravens”….It is the same across all translations, but it seems that it should be sparrows. I would like someone who studied Luke 12 heavily to weigh in. Until then, it’s questionable to me. But not saying it is an ME.

Revelations 22:12…Reads “according as his work shall be” and I remember according to his work. Just doesn’t make sense. However, I am not certain enough to put it into the definite category.

367 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Trackback: List of Mandela Effect/Quantum Effect Scriptures – COMMON SENSE
  2. mandela effect wiki admin
    Jun 27, 2016 @ 12:30:18

    Hi there, I’m the admin of the Mandela-Effect WIki (&Forum).

    I didn’t take the page down. My account was barred, probably due to because too many mails were sent out (i suspect, that my wiki and forum got hacked / after already a disinformagent got on there…)

    Now, the Wiki is still online and an overview (at the moment not up to date with all the changes – please anyone reading this, help keeping it up to date) is available here: http://mandela-effect.bplaced.net/doku.php?id=changes_in_bible-translations_overview

    The forum (which was already online some weeks ago) got moved to another place, due to the fact, that i suspeced, that it got hacked as well. This is the location of the Forum – where LOT AND LOTS AND LOTS of NEW CHANGES got reported lately!!!! It’s horrible!!

    Please check it out: http://mandela-effect.epizy.com/forum/
    Thanks

    Reply

  3. Glenna
    Jun 28, 2016 @ 16:23:54

    is there any way this can be proven to have it being done electricity. I am about to get kicked out of my church for bringing up this subject. some people have head in sand (or would it be ground or earth) 🙂

    Reply

  4. Glenna
    Jun 28, 2016 @ 16:24:28

    that was electronically not electricity

    Reply

    • truthfarmer
      Jun 28, 2016 @ 16:57:07

      It’s not being done electronically per se. That wouldn’t change stuff like this…on your shelf. This is at a quantum level, or supernaturally. I’m sorry to hear your church is causing you grief. Sadly, this is likely to happen all over.

      Reply

      • Bella Chartrand
        Feb 11, 2022 @ 14:22:13

        Yes, all these changes plus many, many more shocking ones have supernaturally changed in my family’s old KJV dated 1913…109 years old. And the Lord’s prayer now says, “which art in heaven’ instead ‘who art in heaven’ like I remember.

  5. Glenna
    Jun 29, 2016 @ 06:37:20

    you must be doing something right or you wouldn’t be under this much attack, same with me. I posted elsewhere. some people have head in sand, or is it ground or earth., my fight is with the NIV putting Luciffer as the morning star, but that is a translation issue. and if they can’t understand that, they will never believe this quantum idea. Keep up the good work, your reward is in heaven.

    Reply

  6. Glenna
    Jun 30, 2016 @ 10:33:36

    on the “new word “piss” it is in my KJV 2 times, but the word pisseth is there still in I sa 25:34,Isa 25:34. 1 Ki 14:10, 1Ki 16:11,2 ki 9:8 I remember the word, because my sister always used that word piss, and my mom objected, so my sis said what word? piss,piss,piss just to aggravate her. but now why in Kings would the word piss and pisseth both be used. agreed, things are being changed, but it looks to me it is being done vise versa, like I remember in the lords prayer “on” earth and not “in” earth and vise versa in other versions. same with word matrix instead of womb as it was always matrix in other versions. work of a spiritual nature and not hard to guess who.

    Reply

  7. Glenna
    Jun 30, 2016 @ 12:22:26

    can you tell me what program you are using to detect changes? when I go to bluebibble .com to check, I can’t find the “piss” change in any other version but the kjv and like I said, the used to be pisseth and still is except in the verses 2ki 18:27 and Isa 36:12 where just the piss is now, but I can’t verify those. have to watch to see if they are just getting rid of the eth words. and can you e-mail me, I would like to help

    Reply

  8. truthfarmer
    Jun 30, 2016 @ 12:54:17

    Hey there,

    Not using a program. I am looking at what people say, and checking my memory and my scriptures here. Biblegateway is a pretty good site for checking scriptures.A lot of people aren’t familiar with KJV 1611 and that causes a lot of consternation for many. It was strange to start with. 🙂

    Reply

  9. Glenna
    Jul 02, 2016 @ 07:56:49

    I have been using the blueletterbible.org for concordance thanks for your response.. I will try the biblegateway .

    Reply

  10. Glenna
    Jul 02, 2016 @ 08:09:54

    I meant to tell you one more thing. this is a translation error, not what you are talking about, but important. in my bro-in-laws new bible called the new living translation (it is not the same as the nlt listed in the concordance) it leaves the name of Peter out and says “friend” and he is asking “why would they leave his name out of the verse”. so he is catching on about the errors and changes in the bibles. When the Bible talked about the famine for the word, this is probably the reason why. . not only watered down, but entirely changed and taken ou. Your gateway charges, Blueletter is free and better.t.

    Jhn 18:10
    Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest’s servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant’s name was Malchus.

    Reply

  11. truthfarmer
    Jul 02, 2016 @ 09:11:20

    Translation errors or changes are something I am accustomed to dealing with. Oh that the ME were that simple.

    When we study scripture, we generally have five translations (a couple KJV, ISR, Restoration, AENT, and the Interlinear Scripture Analyzer) out and the Strong’s concordance, I long ago understood that there couldn’t be a perfect translation, but some are definitely better than others generally, and some that are generally not that great are good on certain passages.

    I never was asked to pay for biblegateway. Please do what you are comfortable with!

    Reply

  12. Glenna
    Jul 03, 2016 @ 07:30:01

    when googleing up changes, they said unicorn was taken out, it is still in mine.
    i had written that biblegateway had a use for free for 30 days. and it didn’t post

     Num 23:22
    God brought them out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn.

     Num 24:8
    God brought him forth out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn: he shall eat up the nations his enemies, and shall break their bones, and pierce them through with his arrows.

     Job 39:9
    Will the unicorn be willing to serve thee, or abide by thy crib?

     Job 39:10
    Canst thou bind the unicorn with his band in the furrow? or will he harrow the valleys after thee?

     Psa 29:6
    He maketh them also to skip like a calf; Lebanon and Sirion like a young unicorn.

     Psa 92:10
    But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an unicorn: I shall be anointed with fresh oil.

    Reply

    • truthfarmer
      Jul 03, 2016 @ 07:48:39

      Hey Glenna,

      I recall people saying it was inserted, and while I have zero recollection of it being in Numbers, I definitely recollect reading ‘unicorn’ in Job. But I can’t say for certain if it was ever in Psalms or not. So I just kind of left it alone. It should be in the questionable changes area though. Some people are swearing it was never in Numbers. I will put the word there and perhaps someone who previously did a study on that in particular can weigh in.

      Reply

    • Scott
      Oct 08, 2016 @ 18:50:03

      Unicornus rhinocerous. An extinct ancient single horned rhinoceros.

      Reply

  13. Glenna
    Jul 03, 2016 @ 13:29:06

    Luke 5:36This is from the New Living Bible from Tyndale House Publishers
    quoted as credit. Scripture quotations are taken from the Holy Bible. New Living Translation, copyright 1996,2004, 2007 by Tyndale House Foundation, Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers Inc. Carol Stream, Ill, 60188. All rights reserved.
    (I was told the reasons for the need of New wineskins for New wine, was because as the wine fermented, the skins stretched, thus if you put new wine into old wineskins, the skins will burst
    It won’t let me copy the text, probably because it is a copyright

    Reply

  14. Glenna
    Jul 03, 2016 @ 13:44:59

    sand
    I think they had the wrong verse (luke 6:49) it is actually inl Mat 7:26

    From the NLT
     Mat 7:26
    But anyone who hears my teaching and doesn’t obey it is foolish, like a person who builds a house on sand.

     Mat 7:27
    When the rains and floods come and the winds beat against that house, it will collapse with a mighty crash.”

     Mat 7:26
    And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:

     Mat 7:27
    And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.

    Reply

    • truthfarmer
      Jul 03, 2016 @ 17:14:43

      I did see that it was still in Matthew. I went to church a lot….and I read scripture a lot and have read all the gospels through numerous times. I do not recall ever seeing “earth” or “ground” in relation to that synoptic parable before.

      Matthew, Mark and Luke are called the synoptic gospels because they record many of the same parables and happenings in just a bit of a different way. John differs significantly from the other three gospels.

      Now, I cannot swear (on a stack of changing bibles) that “ground” and “earth” were never used in Luke’s version, but having read Luke twenty to thirty times, I have no recollection of ever seeing that before.

      Does anyone who is studied have any remembrance of “ground” or “earth” in this parable?

      Reply

      • kategladstone
        Aug 13, 2016 @ 23:47:36

        Yes, I remember it. All the things that people are calling “new” in KJV are things I remember well, ever since the first time I read the KJV cover-to-cover (which was in 1969 when I was six) and whenever else I’ve read the KJV since then.

  15. Glenna
    Jul 04, 2016 @ 14:55:09

    when I mentioned “peter” is the one that cuts off the ear. I find it only in 2 places in John. the other verses say “one of them” or friend. I did not remember ground or earth or matrix , bottles being in my readings either.
    what I am wondering. could this a reason to discourage us into accepting the one world religions bible to come?

    Reply

  16. Glenna
    Jul 05, 2016 @ 19:40:40

    Reply

    • truthfarmer
      Jul 05, 2016 @ 20:11:43

      There are more “pay”triots and “teachers” out there than can be counted. Unfortunately, all the “teachers” that cannot see the changes either should NOT be teachers or they are blind guides. And I have no problem telling them that to their face. Whichever one they want to turn to me, that is.

      I’ve been called more vile names and had more hatred spewed at me over the FACT that several scriptures have changed than I think I have encountered in my entire life. Guess what? The TRUTH hurts.

      Yeshua is the Word of Yah and if scriptures couldn’t be “changed” then how do we have different translations in different languages and errors in all of them?

      Yeshua cannot be changed. His very name means Yah is Salvation.

      Reply

  17. Steve
    Aug 01, 2016 @ 04:48:09

    Isaiah 53:5 (KJV) “…by his stripes we are healed.” to “…with his stripes we are healed.” Had to memorize several times for ACE Christian school. Still references to this in Stryper’s name and other translations.

    Reply

  18. mike parsons
    Aug 05, 2016 @ 09:05:54

    I am listening to the replay of you on The Power Hour on the Mandela effect.
    If time travel allows for changing of the physical, i.e. scripture, books, movies etc. for the obvious purpose of changing perception, it will not effect our memories because we actually lived it the original way. But it is our memories they wish to destroy because it is our memories that conflict with their plan. Sadly, they will use our memories against us to claim we are crazy and when the ignorant jurors see with their eyes the new narrative implanted in the physical, they will convict us. It’s how the deceiver manipulates Gods creation to destroy Gods creation.

    Reply

  19. jennifer
    Aug 05, 2016 @ 10:10:19

    I cant understand why the people who claim they know there bible are not seeing these changes it is really blowing my mind. I have only been saved for a year and I am seeing them and the people that claim they know the lord for 30 years are not seeing it baffles me . Could this be that strong delusion. you have to check this out in the book of matthew 24:37 and 24 :38 use noe instead of noah that looks out of place to me anyones thoughts please also on why are people not seeing this and saying that nothing has changed

    Reply

  20. jennifer
    Aug 05, 2016 @ 10:18:52

    Its really sad when you cant go to your own church about it . I have tried going to the pastors son thru text message and he said nothing has changed and blew me off by saying that his wife is getting uncomfortable with me texting him about this . why did he have to go and make it really weird . I guess there not gonna see it until Jesus comes back

    Reply

  21. Watching
    Aug 12, 2016 @ 13:35:36

    I am new to Jesus and the bible but have been studying a lot. I often search the KJV online bible for certain words. Not more than 2 or 3 days ago I looked up “planet” and no results displayed. I searched the words several times in fact.
    Now today I did a search on the internet and this was a result “2 Kings 23:5”, showing the word planet, which I swear I remember as star. Thoughts?

    Reply

  22. truthfarmer
    Aug 12, 2016 @ 14:51:09

    Whoa. I think you may have found one there. I’ve listened to a lot of believers debate flat earth, and no one ever brought that verse up as evidence of the heliocentric model that we all learn in school. I don’t recall ever reading that anywhere in scripture, but the concordance shows it only occurring that one time. I’ll check with some in the FE community and see what I find. The ISR says ‘constellations’. Thanks…

    Reply

  23. Watching
    Aug 12, 2016 @ 16:19:08

    Thanks!! The FE is what brought me to Jesus. I’m completely convinced that Satan was able to infiltrate science and the global earth revolving around a sun and all these planets was used to make us feel insignificant and draw us away from God, as well as make it easier to pass off the New Age hoopla.

    Reply

  24. Watching
    Aug 12, 2016 @ 16:20:59

    Btw, love your blog. Thanks for your hard work!

    Reply

  25. truthfarmer
    Aug 12, 2016 @ 16:40:23

    You bet! I should probably do more, but I do what I can.

    Reply

  26. kategladstone
    Aug 13, 2016 @ 23:44:01

    The phrase “according as his work shall be” was sensible in Early Modern English (King James era) — in that tone and place, “according as ______ shall be” was the usual way of saying/writing “in accordance with ________.”

    Reply

    • Travis
      Aug 15, 2016 @ 00:19:17

      You’re not wrong. Your memories are your memories, just as the people who have memories that oppose your memories are not wrong. You have existed in this reality from the time you were born. The people who remember these things differently than you do , are transplants into this reality. That”s why YOU see nothing different or changed. This is your home. There are many who are from here and many who are not, but one thing is for sure. THIS is not something people can argue about. No one is wrong. People are from different realities and are being combined together. That’s also why “Snopes” has no authority to make a decision on whats false or not in this case. This is not a tangible object snopes can analyze and say its a fact or fiction. How does snopes determine if a memory in someone elses head is wrong or false?

      Reply

  27. kategladstone
    Aug 13, 2016 @ 23:45:32

    For some great info/examples of KJV Bibld wording/content issues:
    http://www.kjv-only.com/index.html

    Reply

  28. Mark
    Aug 18, 2016 @ 13:04:45

    Luke 19:27 Indeed says what it says. It always has. A very sobering condemnation in the very context of this forum!

    We are to learn “precept on precept, line upon line” (Isaiah 28:10) So, in another place it says “Therefore consider how you listen, for whoever has, to him more will be given, and whoever does not have, even what he thinks that he has will be taken away from him.” (Lk. 8:18)

    In Matthew 24:35, Y’shua (J-sus) promises that His Word should “never pass away”. This whole “Mandela effect” deception, started by a necromancer, Fiona Broome, has been seized upon by people who never committed to memorizing the Bible in the first place as a cause to distrust the Bible. Our ignorance of what the Bible says and our ability to be so easily deceived in our memories should be a war cry— to dive into study as to what it says and follow it, not reject it. And now, more than ever, as deception runs rampant!

    Even now comes the parting of the ways and Y’shua is saying if we don’t accept His word and place ourselves under His reign we shall be destroyed in the life to come. So, shall we do what the word says? Or shall we make ourselves out to be judges of it? (James 4:11)

    How shall we listen? “…with foolish, ignorant controversies; [we] know.. breed quarrels”? (from II Timothy 2:23 ESV) What “more” is it that we would want to “be given” us?

    “And this is eternal life, that they may know Thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom Thou hast sent.” (John 17:3)

    In the Greek, the words above are written to express an ongoing action. We should be in a *process* of getting to know G-d and His ways, getting to know His person and character by living out life with Him. He promises that His sheep would know His voice. Pray to know His voice.

    I write to those who can hear. Those who will not have already set their face to do what they will. They will go on from deception to deception until the great and final Strong Delusion gives their hands in marriage to the the man of sin. And it will be delusion, not deception. Entered into, willingly, “because their deeds were evil.” (John 3:19)

    “Wherever the corpse is, there the vultures will gather” (Matthew 24:28 LEB)

    “Even so, consider yourselves to be dead to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus” (Romans 6:11)

    Come; for everything is ready now!

    Reply

    • truthfarmer
      Aug 18, 2016 @ 15:01:10

      This is for those with the eyes to see. If you don’t see any of the changes, then move along.

      You are saying that the scriptures always referred to Yeshua as “it” and “thing”. In Job, men had breasts full of milk. In Daniel, the sheriffs were there along with the presidents. In the very first line of the bible, heavens (Hebrew shemayim-plural) was and always was heaven, even though I used that to teach my children about Creation and they all remember it as well. You are saying that something that would have caused weeks of study in a seminary (bring mine enemies and behead them in front of me), and had ZERO commentaries on May 27th of this year is “the way it’s always been”….I really hope you develop the eyes to see.

      So, who is deluded? Those who see the deception or those who think supernatural changes cannot occur? Don’t go back for your “stuff”….Seriously? Obviously, there are a lot of people unfamiliar with KJV that think things have changed which haven’t, but sadly, lots of things have indeed changed.

      Matthew 24:35 is talking about Torah–word in Hebrew is one of the meanings of the word torah. Yeshua is the Living Torah, and He is infallible, and He will NOT change. Not the words written down by men in a language you couldn’t understand. If the words on the paper cannot change, you couldn’t read it in your native language.

      I hope you get it before you can’t. The window is closing soon.

      Reply

      • kategladstone
        Aug 26, 2016 @ 18:49:00

        The Job reference to “his breasts are full of milk” is NOT a reference to a human male. Read the WHOLE chapter CAREFULLY: it’s a chapter in which God describes to Job one of God’s more mysterious creations, a monstrous Bible-era animal called a “behemoth” (which is apparently now extinct).

      • kategladstone
        Aug 26, 2016 @ 18:53:56

        The “bring my enemies and behead them” thing is a line in a story being told by Jesus — a parable — and the character who says that line is a character in the story, a nobleman who is angry because not all of his servants made him richer. This is obvious when you read the ENTIRE chapter, the ENTIRE story. Claiming that an order given by a character in a story is really an order given by the storyteller is like claiming that George Lucas told Luke Skywalker “I am your father.”

      • kategladstone
        Aug 26, 2016 @ 19:18:23

        The word “stuff” existed before the KJV was even begun. For instance, Shakespeare used “stuff” in COMEDY OF ERRORS in 1594 — seventeen years before the KJV. Here are two lines from Act Five, Scene One of that play, with the word “stuff” used just as we use it in our own time:

        ————————————————

        COMEDY OF ERRORS, Act Five, Scene One:
        “Master, shall I fetch your stuff from shipboard?”

        “Dromio, what stuff of mine did you put on a ship?”

        ————————————————

        “Stuff” is also in every KJV, clear back to 1611.

      • truthfarmer
        Aug 26, 2016 @ 19:45:54

        You simply don’t get it. “Stuff” may have been a word, but “stuff” wasn’t in the KJV. Yeshua never said, “don’t go back for your ‘stuff'”. If you don’t understand, fine. But please don’t condescend to the rest of us about etymology proven via google searches. That is not the point. If you don’t see the changes, okay. But many millions of us do see them. And time is too short for me to engage in back and forth about this with people who cannot see any changes. So please, stop trying to disprove this to us. I hope you will eventually get it, but I am not going to provide a place to argue back and forth about whether or not things in the KJV have changed. Take that somewhere else, please.

  29. Clay
    Aug 20, 2016 @ 22:07:48

    Luke 12:7 reads sparrows

    Reply

  30. Brian
    Aug 26, 2016 @ 17:25:07

    I recall the lasr word in Revelation being “always” instead of “all”.

    Reply

  31. Brian
    Aug 26, 2016 @ 18:08:59

    Shalom in Yahusha. You.can go to Google Play and download the KJV Bible. It has KJV in green letters.

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gyc.ace.kjv

    Use it to search words that are now changed. This is horrible. The changes are obvious to me and many others with whom I discuss this.

    Reply

    • truthfarmer
      Aug 26, 2016 @ 18:16:21

      It’s a mess alright. Today I learned Isaiah 45:14 changed….Now it says “…There is no God.” Just weird.

      Reply

      • Brian
        Aug 26, 2016 @ 18:24:14

        I just read it. It was not like before.

      • truthfarmer
        Aug 26, 2016 @ 18:32:50

        Right…But Shabbat Shalom! Yeshua doesn’t change.

      • kategladstone
        Aug 26, 2016 @ 18:58:16

        In Hebrew idiom, the statement “There is none else, there is no God” (which is what it says at the end of Isaiah 45:14) means “There is no other god except God.” When you read the chapter CAREFULLY and remember the context (the chapter is about non-Hebrews abandoning their pagan worship and choosing the God of the Hebrews), you will see that this is NOT a proclamation of atheism,

      • Tall Tim
        Sep 02, 2016 @ 13:27:42

        How can anyone explain that?

      • Eileen DiMeco (@SecretPavilion)
        Oct 20, 2016 @ 19:14:39

        I have good news for everyone, the Hebrew is untouched as far as I can see – http://www.blueletterbible.org In response to the person who reported the supernatural edit of KJV saying “there is no God” Here is the HNV in the blueletter. Isa 45:14
        Thus says the LORD: “The labor of Mitzrayim, and the merchandise of Kush, and the Seva’im, men of stature, shall come over to you, and they shall be yours. They shall go after you. In chains they shall come over; and they shall fall down to you. They shall make supplication to you: ‘Surely God is in you; and there is none else, there is no other god.

        Also if you use the audio study files of the lesson in years past like Chuck Smith in the 70s, you can hear the quotes of what used to be in the KJV as I checked on Luke 17:34-35 which had two men in the bed in the new Black Magic edit on the KJV (even your grandma’s old ones) I made a vid on youtube just yesterday about it and you can find it under Eileen DiMeco which is my youtube name.

      • truthfarmer
        Oct 24, 2016 @ 14:23:07

        Do you know if it mentions Italy in the NT? Now, even the AENT says “from the church of Italy at Rome. But Italy wasn’t even a country until 1861.

    • kategladstone
      Aug 26, 2016 @ 19:15:08

      Brian — Why do you change “Yahshua” to “Yahusha”?

      Reply

      • Brian
        Aug 26, 2016 @ 20:08:27

        Yeshua, Yahusha, Yahshua. I would prefer Yahuah in place of LORD which has always been in the KJV

      • truthfarmer
        Aug 26, 2016 @ 20:41:05

        Exactly. There was no vowel pointing in the first century, so all of those are acceptable. I was told by a completed Jew that “technically” Yahshua means Yah cries out for help. So there is a little equivocation on that, but no matter what, if you were to completely Anglicanize the name of Messiah, it would be Joshua, not Jesus. And the nearly 7000 times that YHVH was replaced with Lord indicates there was an issue.

      • Brian
        Aug 26, 2016 @ 20:47:15

        The word “stuff” is now in the KJV 13 times. Come on people! Simce when do you remember that word in a book authorized in 1611?

  32. kategladstone
    Aug 26, 2016 @ 19:14:15

    Brian — the article on the term “matrix” is an article on the MATHEMATICAL term “matrix,” as it is used in higher math (basically, a “matrix” in math is a grid of interacting numbers and equations). The word “matrix” in English (and some other languages) had a LOT of other meanings before then — and its oldest meaning in English (going back to the 14th century) is as another word for “womb” or “uterus,” The history of “matrix” in English (before the very recent math meaning you found) is here — http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=matrix — the other article you found (if you read it CAREFULLY and look at its source, its context) is from a site about MATH vocabulary, dealing with the origin of particular word-meanings that are used in MATH. Deciding that a word did not exist until it later became a math term is as if someone read an article about the invention of Twitter and decided that the word “tweet” (for what birds do) couldn’t have existed until that time.

    Reply

    • Brian
      Aug 26, 2016 @ 20:06:35

      Thank you for your thoughtful incite and explaination of thd word “matrix” Kate. I have read Exodus more times than I can count and never recall this word used. The word “womb” was used as I remember. How about you?

      Reply

    • The thief in the night.
      Oct 01, 2016 @ 15:48:52

      Origins of word Matrix
      matrix (n.) Look up matrix at Dictionary.comlate 14c., “uterus, womb,” from Old French matrice “womb, uterus,” from Latin matrix (genitive matricis) “pregnant animal,” in Late Latin “womb,” also “source, origin,” from mater (genitive matris) “mother” (see mother (n.1)). Sense of “place or medium where something is developed” is first recorded 1550s; sense of “embedding or enclosing mass” first recorded 1640s. Logical sense of “array of possible combinations of truth-values” is attested from 1914. As a verb from 1951.

      Reply

      • truthfarmer
        Oct 01, 2016 @ 16:03:43

        Obviously you do not understand. Etymology isn’t the issue. I also know how to research definitions and the origins of words. The word “matrix” was not in scriptures until earlier this year. If you don’t see the effect, then please just move along. I am not going to argue or get into kerfuffles with people that don’t get it. Enjoy your Froot Loops and Reddi Wip and your sense that scripture hasn’t changed.

  33. thebiblestudyblog
    Aug 30, 2016 @ 23:21:49

    Thank you so very much for posting this.
    The changes are an insult to the intelligence of those of us who study the word, have these scriptures commanded to our memories, and written on the tablets of our hearts.
    It’s a complete and utter slap in the face.

    Reply

  34. solitaire777
    Aug 31, 2016 @ 04:27:05

    For the last many months my belongings have been in storage. Namely my bible which was given to me in 1974. I’ve read it front to back twice and looked through it countless times over the years. My bible is yellowed with age and I remember these various passages well. I have just looked them up and my heart was in my throat at first when I saw how they are right there. There is no denying they have happened in my own bible. I also have a family bible that is over 100 years old. i saw it early this morning as I was looking through boxes for some medicine and will go back for it in a bit as I’m not very well right now. I have a feeling the changes will be in it as well.
    Yes, these changes are disconcerting, but for those who DO have eyes to see and ears to hear, REJOICE! for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! Show no fear to the lowly serpent whose sole desire is to leave you quaking in fear and uncertainty! Be happy! KNOW that our Father will soon be here to rescue us from this pit of hell! ❤

    Reply

  35. solitaire777
    Aug 31, 2016 @ 04:29:09

    The word “MATRIX” was NEVER in the bible. EVER! And yet, my own bible has it now. I have vivid recall of my bible verses and I’m 100% certain that word was NEVER there before.

    Reply

  36. Tall Tim
    Sep 02, 2016 @ 13:24:40

    I am totally seeing these changes. As a child, I read the Bible and went to church, I never knew the scriptures word for word, but I was raised with it. As an adult, in the just the past 10 years, I have read the Bible twice and even took notes the second time around…especially making notations of anything that I thought was odd. In my notes, I did mention Unicorns…so I know that was there, I never remember seeing Matrix or Stuff. This whole ME thing really hit home with me, when I noticed the change in the Lord’s Prayer. I learned that, word for word, as a child and have saying it for years. It was always, “ON Earth, as it is IN Heaven.”…now and always it ha been, IN Earth? I just can’t fathom that. I work professionally as an Electrical Engineer and when I started seeing tech notes about Quantum Computing and all of new science, I knew this was coming. Now scientists are making discoveries that are proving these metaphysical subjects…our reality is changing. I’m just watching and waiting, that’s all that any of us can do.

    Reply

    • truthfarmer
      Sep 02, 2016 @ 14:14:37

      I hear you, Tall Tim. It really rocked my world when I became aware that scriptures were changing on my shelf. And yes, I specifically recall unicorns being mentioned in Job. I am curious about satyrs which are now mentioned in my Nelson KJV and KJV 1611. Did you make any notes on that? The Scofield KJV says he-goats, and has a notation of satyr. I do not at all recollect seeing ‘satyr’ in scriptures.

      Reply

      • Tall Tim
        Sep 02, 2016 @ 15:22:23

        The only other odd animal, from my notes, were the mention of Dragons…so I know that they were in there. I do NOT recall Satyrs; and I was specifically looking for things like this on my second time reading from front to back. There are so many changes now, as I see it, I can’t see how all of these “Christians” out there are not picking up on this stuff…and that’s another one “stuff”…I mean come on. Thanks for your great work here, I was beginning to think that I was losing my mind. At this point, absolutely nothing would surprise me.

      • truthfarmer
        Sep 02, 2016 @ 15:33:47

        You’re quite welcome. I really can’t say I enjoy it at all, but it needed to be done. I don’t know how people cannot see it either. It’s sad to me because I think when they fire up CERN in the Awake protocol this fall that those who can’t see it are going to be completely captivae to what ever GOOgle says is true now. It’s a worry…But Yah is letting this happen, so we know the time is short until Messiah returns. 🙂

  37. Tall Tim
    Sep 02, 2016 @ 15:55:36

    Now “corn” has replaced “grain” all through Genesis. That doesn’t even make historical sense…just like the glass bottles, versus the wineskins. Glass was not common until the Roman times, even then it was considered very valuable; so common people would not have used glass bottles.

    Reply

  38. Lyzzie
    Sep 20, 2016 @ 09:32:47

    Has anyone noticed anything odd about Habakkuk 3:3-4
    God came from Teman, and the Holy One from Paran. Selah. His glory covered the heavens, and the earth was full of his praise. And his brightness was as the light; he had horns coming out of his hand: and there was the hiding of his power.

    Habakkuk is not he most read book, but I do not remember God having horns coming out of his had. Thoughts?

    Reply

    • truthfarmer
      Sep 20, 2016 @ 10:47:32

      I don’t recall horns either, but while I’ve read Habbakuk, I never really studied it intently, so I’m not a reliable witness on this.. My ISR says ‘rays’ not horns.

      Reply

  39. doug
    Sep 22, 2016 @ 19:41:07

    What I don’t get is how come the KJV’s seem to be changed but not the NIV and others that people seem to complain are biased and bad translations? I mean how come the NIV’s seem to have the verses the way we remember them? Maybe we were being read to from the NIV, when we thought it was the KJV?

    Reply

  40. eneida lopez
    Sep 25, 2016 @ 22:58:45

    Trial runs till the fact alterING GOES RIGHT , or REDITIONS OF PEOPLE , or trial runs in obtaining the right finalities like make fabric with different printsor same prints in different colors and or thinknesses and or different elements from cotton ,linen or polimers fabrics (SYNTHETICS), etc.polyester will always be polyestepolBut the prints, armight a potrayalor past event or portend of the future and or just consistant with timeltimeline. Maybe eve hidden symbols might have a comunicating piece of fabric. I believe there several parelell earth realities and they managed tolearn how to go back in time and return. But havent masterred the chess board of life yetj . Just. Smallvariables to change at first see outcomes inthe synthesis of action in the past noting the changes in the future.

    Reply

  41. Eliza
    Sep 27, 2016 @ 20:51:33

    I am on the internet right now searching this after reading the Bible for the first time in a long time today and was reading things that I have never seen before (in common scriptures). My Bible, in Genesis, says that the Nephilim were who “the heroes in the legends of old” were based off of….have you ever heard of this, other than in popular culture? I mean, I had read about how the Nephilim were created, but I have NEVER seen it saying that they were heroes in old legends. After that, I started finding tons of other strange words I hadn’t noticed before….

    Reply

    • truthfarmer
      Oct 01, 2016 @ 15:59:59

      My KJV’s still refer to them as “men of renown”. Not heroes. I haven’t checked all the translations we use regularly, but the KJV is still the same in Gen 6 relating to Nephilim.

      To answer your question, I don’t ever remember seeing any scriptures that referenced Nephilim as heroes. Shalom!

      Reply

  42. The thief in the night.
    Oct 02, 2016 @ 23:09:51

    Who can see the 7 lamp stands?

    And do you see the ONE who walks amongst the candlesticks?
    And who among you can see the wolves in the lamp stands.

    Who among you can see the wolves dressed as sheep?
    The have cunningly snuck in to the field while the shepherd’s have been asleep.

    Dividing, devouring, distorting and scattering .
    For they come dressed in white wool, only to mislead.
    It is in these dangerous times be careful what you believe.
    For now our own eyes will even deceive.

    They have entered each of the lamp stands while the weary shepherds sleep.
    They divide one house from another – blinding each of sheep.
    Changing The Word, The Foundation, The Core and The Root.
    Blinding ones eyes from the very TRUTH.

    Can you not see that each candle sticks share the same flame?

    The wolves are cunning, appearing in white wool.
    But by there divisive words you will know them as fools.

    So a time has come, to question your own beliefs.
    For it has been written, that even the elect will be deceived.

    So do not be afraid to question what you consider to be Truth!
    As a belief is often a weed which has grown on top of the Root.

    Who among you has filled there wine skin to the brim?

    And what of your lanterns? Have you enough oil, to see through this dark night that we are in?

    For we are in the darkest of nights and its easy to stray.
    If you have not taken enough oil then you shall surely lose your way.

    Stand firm in solidarity in these dark times. Have firm faith in One God until the Sun shines.

    Reply

  43. Sharon Reis
    Oct 06, 2016 @ 23:54:27

    We have a website where we are tracking and recording the changes. Right now we have recorded 1488 changes and more will be added. You can view the list we have on our website: https://quantumeffectconcerningscriptures.net/
    You will have to register if you want to view the html or pdf file that you can dowload and print.

    Reply

  44. Trackback: COG – Italian Ndrangheta Mafia Boss “hiding” behind Kitchen Cabinets PSYOP (False Flag/Nuclear War) | Cabinet Shop
  45. Mike
    Oct 11, 2016 @ 22:49:08

    i saw a video comparing the internet historical picture of Isaiah 45 14.. kjv to the present version… and although the meaning is not lost, there appears to be a deliberate attempt to destroy God’s Word with slight changes and confusion… we have to write down in hand what we have as a precaution. I’m not going to even try to guess the cause of it; if someone has a handwritten copy of the kjv copied before 1999, please email me.

    Reply

  46. earthadditives
    Oct 15, 2016 @ 16:33:54

    I am blessed by the discussion here and am finding more unity with the bride through this trial then ever before. Praise be Yeshua! I became much more convicted of my faith after the Spirit revealed FE to me and I believe that the origin of the KJV is why this is the dominant book with changes. Here is an incredible article on the pictured title page of the 1611 version being Rosicrucian. I absolutely believe now that the alchemist power in which was behind the scenes of this version is the dominating factor to these changes in our time now. http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/k1001.cfm

    Reply

  47. earthadditives
    Oct 15, 2016 @ 16:38:45

    I also am just curious as to how many of you hold to the Flat Earth model that we find in scripture being true. Anyone else?

    Reply

  48. Cheri
    Oct 22, 2016 @ 08:42:28

    We have some super old bibles in our house and last night my husband and I were comparing them, and I noticed in one of our bibles from 1868, Genesis 1:21, it says “and God created great whales”, instead of “sea creatures”. Also Acts 12:4 says “intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people”. The Jews didn’t celebrate the pagan holiday of Easter. So why is it in a bible that old? My husband and I believe it’s all part of the coming great deception, and for those who are studying and aware of what’s going on, you realize that the portals have been opened and the nephilim are released on the earth.

    Recently my father-in-law was at a red light and told me this huge bug that he thought was a praying mantis landed on the side of his car near the windshield. He went on to tell me he never saw anything like it, and said it had the ugliest face he’d ever seen, and skinny arms and legs, and he could see the fingers on it. He said it was trying to get in his car! A few weeks prior, my husband got the newest LA Marzulli DVD and book, which shows an ugly fairy like creature (later proven to be a fake), so I got the book and showed my father-in-law the pictures of the fairy. He said that was exactly what it looked like. He kept talking about how he never saw anything so ugly and how much terror he felt for the short time his car was stopped. He is born again, so I reminded him that he is protected from the tricks of the enemy.

    Has anyone else had any experiences like this?

    Reply

  49. Wakinyan
    Oct 30, 2016 @ 18:17:40

    Shalom. This is extremely interesting. My brother Emmanuel has been telling me about this Mandela effect, and how it’s been changing scripture. I started researching it this morning, and have been reading it throughout the day at work. I stumbled across your page and this has been extremely informative. I am very eager to get home & check out my hard copies, all I have is my KJV w/ strong’s app & my E-sword. What’s amazing is that these last couple months I have had the idea & strong feeling to hand write copies of scriptures, I finally began hand copying the Didache a week ago because I only have a pdf version, but now I have decided to hand copy all of my scriptures like I should have a while ago! Hope it’s not too late.

    Reply

  50. carla ifera
    Nov 10, 2016 @ 04:41:10

    ……..check out Rev. 7:5-8……….they changed some of the names of the tribes of Israel……….correct spellings are still in Gen. 48-49, (as of today)………also, look at how names Potiphar and Pharoh are changed……..many, many other changes……….

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: