Quantum Effect, Mandela Effect Videos and Lists

Recently, I have been consumed with trying to figure out how things are changing in the physical world from this quantum effect. I am particularly interested in scriptural changes, as it is the one thing I thought I could always depend on to remain the same. Here is a list that I know has a few mistakes on it because people fail to differentiate between KJV and KJV 1611. However, many of these are solid changes. For example, neither KJV or KJV 1611 ever had the word “matrix” for womb, and now it has that word five times in Exodus and in Numbers. Never mind “don’t go back for your stuff” in Luke 17:31.

I also am very interested in what it is that causes people to either perceive changes or fail to perceive any changes. There are numerous theories about how these changes may have manifested, and a lot of those theories have to do with CERN, the large Hadron collider in Geneva, Switzerland. There are many other smaller colliders, and if you are interested, you can research those locations and experiments as well. I simply don’t have time to do that right now.

Here’s a summary of the theories that I am aware of people putting forth:

We have slipped into a different time stream without our awareness.

There is a warp where time streams are overlapping, which is why some people remember some things and others do not remember.

There have been some anatomical changes in us particularly in our vision and in our hearing.

We are in a different dimension passing through to another existence.

Everyone that perceives changes has died and we are in an inbetween existence.

And what I believe….Cern has opened a portal and artificial intelligence is working through a quantum computer changing certain things and running algorithm checks on the program to determine who is resistant to their programming and why. I think this is the beginning of the strong delusion.

Here is a video, published on 11/3/2014 by CERN that has “Mandela” at the 2:33 mark. It’s about 3 and half minutes with a load of symbology in it.

Now, I am not telling anyone else what to think. Do your own research and determine what it is that YOU think. Here is a large list, and I in no way agree with everything on this list, but it is a good starting point. Perhaps you perceive no changes. Okay, then don’t worry about it.

My favorite guy on You Tube for scriptural changes who also seems to share my theory is Photohelix.

Here is a link to what I consider to be his most important video. He has a bunch of them, and I highly recommend his videos on the effect and scripture.

Then, the man that has done the most research on CERN. His name is Anthony Patch and if you click on this link, you can read his “ubiquitous” quotes.

Here is a video of his that I think is terrifically important:

Finally, it may interest you to know that CERN is now claiming creation of the internet. CERN and GOOGLE have quantum computers…These are AI computers that state that they work through other dimensions to compute answers to effectively unfathomable questions. Here’s the link for CERN’s claims regarding the internet. And here is a short video about the CERN operatic dance called “Symmetry”:

The Mandela Effect, Or Quantum Effect: What do you see?

If you haven’t yet heard about the Mandela Effect, get ready to learn about it. It is very interesting and very, very “woo woo”. I seriously did not want to say anything about it because it is, far and away, the biggest, strangest, scariest and weirdest thing I have ever come across. But as you can tell, I decided I just had to say something about it anyway. By the time you get to the end of this, you will understand the reticence, because if people do NOT get this, they think that you are….well, crazy.

First, to define it. The term Mandela Effect was coined by a lady named Fiona Broome.  Evidently, thousands of people recall Nelson Mandela dying in prison, and recall watching the funeral on television and details that don’t bear out via internet searches. Mandela evidently died in 2013, not in the late 1980’s or early 1990’s as many people recall. More people recall other things than the earlier demise of Mandela, so it is a bit of a misnomer, bit it has been named “Mandela Effect” because of so many people having that memory of Mandela’s death. I’ll run through a short list of things, and you can see what your memory tells you about this “effect”. It runs across the full spectrum of media, product names, marketing and even scripture….Scripture is why I have involved myself in looking into this so intently.

So, here is the “Mandela Effect” intro…(drum roll, please!)

What is the most common adult diaper on the market? “Depends” is what everyone calls it, and what a lot of people remember, but…(you might need one by the time I am done, ahem)…It is now, and always has been, “Depend”. No “s”.

How about Bragg’s vinegar? That is seriously good vinegar, and highly recommended by many for all of the great things that good cider vinegar does for a body. Now it is….and always has been, “Bragg”. Again, no “s”.

Do you remember “Looney Toons”? Well, they still have “Tiny Toons”, but “Looney Toons” is now, and always has been, “Looney Tunes”.

Do you remember Redi Whip? The aerosolized whip cream in the refrigerator section? It is now, and always has been…”Reddi Wip”.

How about “Fruit Loops”? Evidently, now, when it came out in the late 1950’s, it was, and always has been, “Froot Loops”.

I definitely see the humor in “Looney Toons” and “Fruit Loops” both being on this list!

In the original Disney movie Snow White, what did the evil queen say when she spoke to the mirror?……….

... -guest-wish-list---evil-queen-from-snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs

(long pause for effect…Pun intended….)

“Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the fairest of them all?”

That’s what I recall. But now, it is, and always has been….”Magic mirror on the wall…”

Mind you, this is on old VHS tapes, and on our old DVD here. It changed on our shelf, and even our youngest noted it. Honestly, it made her mad.

How about “The Empire Strikes Back”? If you remember the fight scene between Luke and Darth Vader, where Vader chops off Luke’s hand, what did Vader say to Luke about Luke’s father?

Was it, “Luke, I am your father”?

Or, was it, “No, I am your father”?

Lots of people remember, “Luke, I am your father”—

but now…it is and always has been, “No, I am your father”.

Evidently, James Earl Jones didn’t forget the line he originally said. Glitch in the matrix?

There are literally hundreds of these examples. I don’t see, or agree with all of them, but here is a list someone began so that people would have an easy way to check things.

Then, for those of you who are believers, what kind of animal lays down with the lamb?

If you answered “lion”, we remember the same thing. I even have it marked in both places in Isaiah (11:6 and 65:25) in my very worn out KJV 1611 from the 1990’s.

But now, it says, “the wolf shall also dwell with the lamb….” And it “always” has said the wolf shall dwell with the lamb. But it didn’t. And according to one person who was working on a play, it changed about 9 months ago in Isaiah 11:6. According to a good friend, her scriptures said “lion” in Isaiah 65:25 on May 26th, and then on May 28th, it had changed to the wolf.

These are hard copies of printed bibles that are on our shelves. Not new ones that have been edited in a publisher’s office and then printed. This is changing on the shelf.

Also, a very famous verse that both believers and non-believers have memorized is different. In Matthew 7:1, it always used to say “Judge not, lest ye be judged”.  Now it says, “Judge not that ye be not judged”.

There are a lot of things out there that people are saying is the “Mandela Effect” that is really just a memory issue. But there are many, many, other things that are solidly changed… and changing scripture is a huge, huge issue. And there are a lot of changes in scripture and most of them are in the King James Version.

We have six different versions of KJV here, and my Nelson Study Bible has the most changes along with my KJV 1611. The Scofield KJV Reference Bible still says  in Matthew 9:17 “Neither do men put new wine into old wineskins, else the wineskins break, and the wine runneth out, and the wineskins perish; but they put new wine into new wineskins, and both are preserved.” But the other KJV versions here now say “bottles” instead of wineskins. And “bottles” makes zero sense. Old bottles do NOT break when you put new wine into them. A cork might blow, but the bottles don’t break unless you drop them.

This is a video from a guy that I think really has this issue figured out. This is about the division between those who see this, and those who don’t. It’s about half an hour in length and may help you get this a little better:

 

Here is the latest video from photohelix. This explains the quantum aspect of this a little more. It is a bit lengthy, over an hour, but it gives insight that appears to be very important into this issue.

 

Let me know your thoughts on this. I’m very curious to know what people think.

 

FBI Doesn’t Want to Let You Know About Your Biometrics

As most of you know, your driver’s license puts you into a global database. It goes like this. The Dept of Motor Vehicles takes a high definition photo of you when you get or renew your license. That pic gets sent to a company called Morphos Trust. They then upload your high definition biometrically calculated (or calculatable) photo to their parent company Safran International. Then Safran sends it on to the IMF, World Bank and Interpol. They will assure that it is all innocent and won’t be used to establish a cashless society. Nice, huh?

Anyway, here is the article I was referencing above:

FBI Wants to Exempt Its Massive Biometric Database from Some Federal Privacy Rules

Sergey Nivens/Shutterstock.com

The FBI wants to block individuals from knowing if their information is in a massive repository of biometric records, which includes fingerprints and facial scans, if the release of information would “compromise” a law enforcement investigation.

The FBI’s biometric database, known as the “Next Generation Identification System,” gathers a wide scope of information, including palm prints, fingerprints, iris scans, facial and tattoo photographs, and biographies for millions of people.

On Thursday, the Justice Department agency plans to propose the database be exempt from several provisions of the Privacy Act — legislation that requires federal agencies to share information about the records they collect with the individual subject of those records, allowing them to verify and correct them if needed.

Aside from criminals, suspects and detainees, the system includes data from people fingerprinted for jobs, licenses, military or volunteer service, background checks, security clearances, and naturalization, among other government processes.

Letting individuals view their own records, or even the accounting of those records, could compromise criminal investigations or “national security efforts,” potentially revealing a “sensitive investigative technique” or information that could help a subject “avoid detection or apprehension,” the draft posting said.

Another clause requires agencies to keep the records they collect to assure individuals any determination made about them was made fairly. Arguing for an exemption, the FBI posting claimed it is “impossible to know in advance what information is accurate, relevant, timely and complete” for “authorized law enforcement purposes.”

“With time, seemingly irrelevant or untimely information may acquire new significance when new details are brought to light,” the posting said. Information contained in the database could help with “establishing patterns of activity and providing criminal lead.”

» Get the best federal technology news and ideas delivered right to your inbox. Sign up here.

The proposal, open for public comment for a month after it’s officially posted, would set a worrying precedent in which law enforcement has significant leeway to decide what information to collect without informing the subject, according to Jeramie Scott, a national security counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a research group advocating for digital civil liberties.

In 2014, EPIC won a lawsuit against the FBI, arguing the contracts and technical requirements supporting the Next Generation Identification database be published.

The proposal’s suggestion that data could be used to establish “patterns of activity” was particularly troubling, Scott said.

“We don’t know exactly what that means,” Scott told Nextgov in an interview. “If you have no ability to access the record the FBI has on you, even when you’re not part of an investigation or under investigation, and lo and behold inaccurate information forms a ‘pattern of activity’ that then subjects you to [be] the focus of the FBI, then that’s a problem.”

It’s unclear how many individuals are covered in the database. FBI documents obtained by privacy rights group the Electronic Frontier Foundation in 2014 suggested the FBI’s facial recognition component was on track to contain 52 million images by 2015.

FBI did not respond to Nextgov’s request for comment.

Monsanto Announces New Poison For Your Consumption

Monsanto, arguably one of the ten most hated corporations in the world, is going to release a more deadly genetically modified strain for everyone to get sick and or die from. Sometimes I become speechless. The loathing and disgust I feel over altering things that are food and turning them into tertiary or quaternary things that can be swallowed is causing me to feel a little speechless right at the moment. Does their logo have a plant in a coffin?

Here’s an article about their recent bragging:

Monsanto announces new technology to make its GM crops more pest resistant

 The entrance sign is seen at the headquarters of Monsanto in St. Louis, Missouri © Juliette Michel
Monsanto says it has developed breakthrough technology to help make its crops more resistant to bugs and pests. The new techniques will help target insects that have developed resistance to previously genetically modified crops.

The research was conducted by scientists at Harvard University in conjunction with Monsanto. The aim was to try and speed up the process of generating proteins, which have properties that can kill pests.

The team was using PACE (phage-assisted continuous evolution) technology, which is able to eliminate insects that have grown resistant to prior agricultural solutions. The PACE method is 100 times faster than other methods in trying to identify protein with insect killing properties, according to the research team.

“Scientific breakthroughs like PACE technology are key to continue bringing solutions to farmers to help them get more out of every acre,” Tom Adams, vice president of biotechnology at Monsanto said in a press release.

“The remarkable progress that’s been made in applying PACE to agriculture biotechnology is a huge testament to the success that comes when parties work together and collaborate to advance science in a way that can bring long-term benefits to global agriculture.”

The importance of the technique means that the proteins are able to be developed at faster than the insects and pests are able to become resistant.

“It’s a breakthrough in a way we can handle resistance in the future,” Tom Malvar, the head of insect control discovery at Monsanto said, according to the Agriculture journal. “This technology is not limited to insect control. We envision this having broad applications,” he added.

In November, a report by Greenpeace slammed the genetically modified (GM) crop industry, for failing to tackle problems regarding superbugs caused by insects becoming resistant to previously genetically modified crops.

“GM crops can only increase yield by reducing losses to pests in years of high infestation, and this effect is not permanent as pesticide-producing crops lead to resistant ‘superbugs’. GM crop yields have often failed to isolate the effects of GM technology from other factors, or to compare like-for-like farms,” the report stated.

GM corn and soyabeans have given smaller yields in recent years in the US due to pests and weeds becoming resistant to weedkillers used to protect the plants.

In March, the US Department of Agriculture announced its intention to end regulation of Monsanto’s GM corn that is engineered to resist the company’s herbicide, meaning that farmers will now be able to plant the corn strains without permits.

However, the move was slammed by critics, with the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, a nonprofit advocating pro-family farm policies, saying the unregulated process could lead to environmental damage.

“Without a coordinated and thorough evaluation of the full technology package, and a meaningful analysis of impacts, adding yet another new crop/herbicide package will continue adding to the existing harmful effects on herbicides on ecological systems, human health, and farmers’ livelihoods through herbicide drift and non-target crop losses; the widespread increase in herbicide-resistant weeds; and environmental and public health impacts,” the group said in a statement.

In November, protesters took to the streets in hundreds of cities around the world for the 2015 Million Mask March, which saw activists storm the doors of Monsanto in Washington, DC. In May, activists from over 400 cities spoke out against GMOs and Monsanto’s monopoly over the food supply.

Activists accuse the agricultural corporation of selling toxic chemicals, which are bad for people’s health, water supplies, vital crop pollinators and the environment in general. The giant is also criticized for its attitude towards food safety regulations and staunch opposition to GMO labeling. Small farmers blame Monsanto for monopolizing the seed market.

In January, Seattle announced its intention to sue Monsanto over allegations the company polluted the Lower Duwamish River and city drainage pipes, becoming the sixth city to file a lawsuit against the bio-tech giant.

“Long after the dangers of PCBs were widely known, Monsanto continued its practice of protecting its business interests at our expense,” City Attorney Pete Holmes said in a statement. “The City intends to hold Monsanto accountable for the damage its product wreaked on our environment.”

Chemtrail Flu, Mystery Bacteria, etc- Geoengineering Is Evil

Seems like everyone I know has come down with a very rough respiratory illness recently. Many people have died from it, and some of us who got it felt like we just might die. Elderly people, particularly those with existing respiratory issues have had the hardest time.

Dr. Edward Group even came down with it, and he is pretty close to the epitome of health and consciousness. I heard part of an interview with him a few weeks back and he said that there were four infectious components (not including the seemingly ever present barium and aluminum) in this most recent and most virulent version of chemtrail flu. This thing really likes to hang on as well with most people feeling sick for about three weeks overall.

I wanted to share the following with you. I think it’s good that there is finally a lawsuit over this in the works.

If you are one of the few people who still think there actually are NOT chemtrails, here is a link to an extensive Senate hearing on testing biological weapons on those of us in the US without our knowledge or consent. For extra credit, you can explain to all of us who know what these things are even if the ingredients vary from time to time, why the US has treaties with other countries to NOT spray their skies with their geoengineering products.

If you are on the fence, very simply, contrails disappear and chemtrails morph into cloud like formations and don’t disperse like contrails do.

Here is the interview:

All-Out Assault on All Life on Earth-Dane Wigington

By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com   (Early Sunday Release)

Dane Wigington, founder of the global climate engineering informational website, GeoengineeringWatch.org, says climate manipulation, commonly referred to as chemtrails, is the number one factor in destroying the planet and much of humanity. Wigington contends, “We have now enough data to prove that the greatest destructive factor, by far, on the ozone layer is geoengineering (chemtrails). It’s disrupting the hydrological cycle and disrupting the planet. We have governmental agencies that are set up to hide this fact from the population or to mask it. . . . We are seeing UVB levels that are a 1,000 % more than we are being told. . . . We have all the data being skewed to hide the severity of what is happening from the population for as long as possible. . . . We have friends behind the curtain that know this is going on and want it to stop. . . . I truly believe we have a growing number of allies behind the curtain that want this to stop as bad as we do. Let’s hope that is true and our allies grow because this is truly an all-out assault on all life on earth. How long can we hold our breath? Any breath we take is laden with these materials. We absolutely know it from lab testing. It’s not speculation or theory or conjecture. We see the human health statistics that are associated with this. The massive Alzheimer’s, dementia, autism and COPD. . . . Anyone who looks up, they can see how incredibly obvious this monstrosity is in our skies.”

Wigington is part of a group that recently filed a geoengineering lawsuit against the Canadian government. Wigington says, “It was filed on March 9th, and it is the first lawsuit of its type. We hope to follow suit in the U.S . . . and we hope what we do will be a template for others in other states. There is also legislation in Rhode Island currently under consideration to ban these programs. It is all designed to bring public awareness to the fact that we are under an all-out assault from toxic climate engineering. This is what the lawsuit in Canada is based on.”

Scientists who would like to speak out about the harmful effects of climate engineering (chemtrails) are being threatened and gagged as Wigington points out, “U.S. government scientists have no First Amendment protection–none. Now, there is a federal gag order on all National Weather Service and all NOAA employees. How much more obvious is this situation, and they are trying to plug leaks in the ship. We have environmental scientists being fired all over. Canada has let go a huge number of their scientists. Australia has fired 450 of their front line environmental scientists. Why? Because they want to cover up what’s happening any way they can. They are trying to obscure the severity of what is unfolding from the public for as long as possible. If we don’t take care of what is happening in our skies and environment, nothing else is going to matter. . . . Nothing is going to matter soon. That’s how bad it is. . . . What our government and other governments are doing is to try to hide the magnitude of what is unfolding until the last possible moment, at which time total collapse ensues.”

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Dane Wigington, founder of GeoEngineeringWatch.org.

(There is much more in the video interview.)

After the Interview:

Wigington says that the greatest and most imminent issue we face mathematically is a climate catastrophe. Wigington goes on to say the only thing that is a bigger threat is “nuclear war.” GeoEngineeringWatch.org is run entirely on donations. If you would like to contribute to getting the word out, please go to GeoEngineeringWatch.org and click on the “Donate” button on the upper right hand side of the home page. There is also a snail mail address just under the “Donate” button. There is also lots of free information about geoengineering there as well.
For a copy of the recently filed Canadian geoengineering lawsuit, click here.

 

Mind Control??? Why yes, they can!

Most everyone with any snap at all, knows about chemtrails to some extent. We know they generally contain at least barium and aluminum Then there are other things that often show up in analyzed samples of residue from these things. Sometimes other chemicals, sometimes nanobots, sometimes viruses, sometimes dried red blood cells…We know it’s not good, but we are powerless to really stop it. Heck, the US has had a treaty to NOT do it to other nations, but the government here is free to geoengineer in US skies as much as they want.

Then a few are aware of nanoparticles in our food and cosmetics. Never mind that after the FDA said they were fine for adding as flavor enhancers and preservatives, the only real study done at the time (about five years ago) showed that ingesting this stuff was incredibly detrimental to mice consuming a very small amount of nanoparticles.

What the video I am posting here shows, is actually quite horrific. It is three hours long, and you will likely need to take it in chunks. It isn’t slick, and there are a few areas that I don’t really have any interest in, but what is brought clearly into focus is that we are, and have been, subjected to mechanisms of mind control that seem completely sci-fi in their scope. Perhaps if enough people become aware of the things being done to us, it will weaken the power they are exercising on so many of us. Maybe we can even come up with actual methods to break these actions? I don’t know, but I hope so. They’ve been doing this concertedly since the mid 70’s and it is increasing at a very rapid rate.

SO, for your consideration, Here is the full documentary entitled “Touchless Torture: Target Humanity” , and don’t be surprised if you find yourself saying, “No way.” I found myself with that thought even though it is pretty well documented and I had some familiarity with some of the subject matter.

 

 

Another Monsanto Protection Act in the Works

Yet another government protection racket benefiting Monsanto is in play. Source is linked in the title:

Pending Chemical Bill Could Protect Monsanto from Lawsuits

Ongoing congressional discussions about chemical oversight legislation could determine whether Monsanto should be forced to pay hundreds of millions over its production of now-banned industrial chemicals.

The New York Times reports that the House version of a bill to revise the outdated Toxic Substances Control Act specifically targets legal liability for polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs.

PCBs had a wide variety of industrial uses as a fire retardant, including in production of paints, pesticides and paper. But the chemicals were also linked to environmental concerns and severe health problems and were banned in the 1970s.

Monsanto produced nearly all PCBs over the course of more than four decades, and recent litigation over the chemicals has skyrocketed — from individuals dealing with health complications to school districts and municipalities with crumbling PCB-laden buildings.

In addition, six cities are suing the agrichemical giant over the costs to clean up PCB pollution.

But a provision inserted in the House version of the chemical bill stipulates that past EPA regulations would disqualify legal claims — and specifically referenced agency restrictions on PCBs.

That, the Times reported, could allow Monsanto attorneys to seek dismissal of PCB-related lawsuits. An attorney representing Monsanto in Texas federal court cited the language during a case in November.

Republican aides denied that the provision was added on Monsanto’s behalf but did not offer further details in the report; Monsanto told the Times that the company did not ask for it and that, regardless, it is not responsible for improper disposal of PCBs.

Numerous states, meanwhile, also worry that the House and Senate versions of the chemical bill would, in different ways, delay or prohibit state restrictions of chemicals under EPA review.

It remains to be seen what language will emerge in a final bill, but despite the numerous complaints, seemingly all involved in the debate despise the Toxic Substances Control Act and want an overhaul to pass.

Previous Older Entries Next Newer Entries